On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mount.cifs.8 |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mount.cifs.8 b/mount.cifs.8
> index 64a8b64..48f9312 100644
> --- a/mount.cifs.8
> +++ b/mount.cifs.8
> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ ntlm Use NTLM password hashing (default)
>  .sp -1
>  .IP \(bu 2.3
>  .\}
> -ntlmi Use NTLM password hashing with signing (if 
> /proc/fs/cifs/PacketSigningEnabled on or if server requires signing also can 
> be the default)
> +ntlmi Use NTLM password hashing with signing

Nitpicking, perhaps this should be 'packet signing' instead
of just 'signing' to be consistent with other such phrases.

>  .RE
>  .sp
>  .RS 4
> @@ -371,9 +371,31 @@ ntlmv2 Use NTLMv2 password hashing
>  .IP \(bu 2.3
>  .\}
>  ntlmv2i Use NTLMv2 password hashing with packet signing
> +.RE
> +.sp
> +.RS 4
> +.ie n \{\
> +\h'-04'\(bu\h'+03'\c
> +.\}
> +.el \{\
> +.sp -1
> +.IP \(bu 2.3
> +.\}
> +ntlmssp Use NTLMv2 password hashing encapsulated in NTLMSSP message

Not sure whether we need to even mention that this is Raw NTLMSSP

> +\h'-04'\(bu\h'+03'\c
> +.\}
> +.el \{\
> +.sp -1
> +.IP \(bu 2.3
> +.\}
> +ntlmsspi Use NTLMv2 password hashing encapsulated in NTLMSSP message and 
> enable packet signing
>  .RE
> -[NB This [sec parameter] is under development and expected to be available 
> in cifs kernel module 1\&.40 and later]
> +.sp
> +If the server requires signing during protocol negotiation, then it may be 
> enabled automatically. Signing may also be enabled automatically if it's 
> enabled in /proc/fs/cifs/SecurityFlags.
>  .RE
>  .PP
>  nobrl
> --
> 1.7.6.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to