typo - I meant:

With the proposed cifs.ko fix to honor maxmpx, cifs_max_pending
becomes a limit when the server ...

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Steve French <[email protected]> wrote:
>  (as Windows often is) has more than 50
> maxmpxct in its registry.   Does anyone mind if I update the maximum
> to one or two hundred? (after the mpx fix is in)?
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  fs/cifs/cifsfs.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
>> index b0a2e16..fa67245 100644
>> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
>> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
>> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ module_param(cifs_min_small, int, 0);
>>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(cifs_min_small, "Small network buffers in pool. Default: 
>> 30 "
>>                                 "Range: 2 to 256");
>>  unsigned int cifs_max_pending = CIFS_MAX_REQ;
>> -module_param(cifs_max_pending, int, 0);
>> +module_param(cifs_max_pending, int, 0444);
>>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(cifs_max_pending, "Simultaneous requests to server. "
>>                                   "Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256");
>>  unsigned short echo_retries = 5;
>> --
>> 1.7.6.4
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to