On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:54:16 +0400
Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Steve French <[email protected]>
> 
> wait_for_free_request is called to ensure that we don't have more than the
> configured maximum of requests in flight on the wire (for cifs), but for SMB2,
> the number of requests that can be in flight varies dynamically (the client
> may request that the server grant more "credits" in a request, and each
> request uses at least one credit).   Instead of migrating over the original
> smb2_wait_for_free_request function, simply add a check in cifs's original
> wait_for_free_request for the is_smb2 case to make sure that we don't go
> beyond the number of allocated "credits" (ie those that remain from those
> the server has allocated for this tcp session).  Otherwise the logic is 
> unchanged
> (other than to make it extern so that the next function to be added, 
> smb2_sendrcv2
> in  smbtransport.c can call it - smb2_sendrcv2 will be migrated over in the 
> next patch).
> 
> Note that smb2 servers will typically allow many more requests in flight at 
> one time
> than cifs servers (which usually default to only 50) and can adjust this as 
> needed.
> This should provide significant performance benefit in some workloads (ie smb2
> in many cases will get more parallelism than cifs and some other protocols
> since some artificially constrain the maximum number of requests).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifsglob.h  |    1 +
>  fs/cifs/cifsproto.h |    3 ++-
>  fs/cifs/transport.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> index 179b784..b440329 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ struct TCP_Server_Info {
>       wait_queue_head_t read_q; /* used by readpages */
>       atomic_t active_readpage_req; /* used by readpages */
>       atomic_t resp_rdy; /* used by readpages and demultiplex */
> +     atomic_t credits;  /* send no more simultaneous requests than this */
>       __le16 smb2_dialect_revision; /* SMB2.0 implemented, 2.1 recognized */
>       struct task_struct *observe;
>       char smb2_crypt_key[CIFS_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE]; /* BB can we use cifs key */
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> index ef4f631..84d1e4c 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  /*
>   *   fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
>   *
> - *   Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2002,2008
> + *   Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2002,2011
>   *   Author(s): Steve French ([email protected])
>   *
>   *   This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ extern char *cifs_compose_mount_options(const char 
> *sb_mountdata,
>  extern struct mid_q_entry *AllocMidQEntry(const struct smb_hdr *smb_buffer,
>                                       struct TCP_Server_Info *server);
>  extern void DeleteMidQEntry(struct mid_q_entry *midEntry);
> +extern int wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info *sv, const int 
> long_op);
>  extern int cifs_call_async(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec *iov,
>                          unsigned int nvec, mid_receive_t *receive,
>                          mid_callback_t *callback, void *cbdata,
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c
> index 0cc9584..25d04df 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ smb_send(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct smb_hdr 
> *smb_buffer,
>       return smb_sendv(server, &iov, 1);
>  }
>  
> -static int wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info *server,
> +int wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info *server,
>                                const int long_op)
>  {
>       if (long_op == CIFS_ASYNC_OP) {
> @@ -265,7 +265,8 @@ static int wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info 
> *server,
>  
>       spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
>       while (1) {
> -             if (atomic_read(&server->inFlight) >= cifs_max_pending) {
> +             if ((server->is_smb2 == false) &&
> +                 atomic_read(&server->inFlight) >= cifs_max_pending) {
>                       spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
>                       cifs_num_waiters_inc(server);
>                       wait_event(server->request_q,
> @@ -273,6 +274,16 @@ static int wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info 
> *server,
>                                    < cifs_max_pending);
>                       cifs_num_waiters_dec(server);
>                       spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2
> +             } else if (server->is_smb2 &&
> +                       (atomic_read(&server->credits) < 1)) {
> +                     spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
> +                     cifs_num_waiters_inc(server);
> +                     wait_event(server->request_q,
> +                                atomic_read(&server->credits) > 0);
> +                     cifs_num_waiters_dec(server);
> +                     spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2 */
>               } else {
>                       if (server->tcpStatus == CifsExiting) {
>                               spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
> @@ -283,8 +294,13 @@ static int wait_for_free_request(struct TCP_Server_Info 
> *server,
>                          as they are allowed to block on server */
>  
>                       /* update # of requests on the wire to server */
> -                     if (long_op != CIFS_BLOCKING_OP)
> +                     if (server->is_smb2 == false &&
> +                         long_op != CIFS_BLOCKING_OP)
>                               atomic_inc(&server->inFlight);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2
> +                     else if (server->is_smb2)
> +                             atomic_dec(&server->credits);
> +#endif
>                       spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
>                       break;
>               }

This patch doesn't make much sense...

"credits" gets initialized to 0, then on the first request, you'll
decrement it which will make it go negative. I then don't see any place
where credits is ever incremented.

Maybe that happens in a different patch, but splitting your patches out
this way makes no sense. No one can reasonably review this patch for
sanity since the lifecycle of "credits" is incomplete.

-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to