On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:50:50 +0400
Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/connect.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> index ccafded..3647b1a 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> @@ -1058,13 +1058,15 @@ cifs_demultiplex_thread(void *p)
>               if (mid_entry != NULL) {
>                       if (!mid_entry->multiRsp || mid_entry->multiEnd)
>                               mid_entry->callback(mid_entry);
> -             } else if (!server->ops->is_oplock_break(buf, server)) {
> +             } else if (!server->ops->is_oplock_break ||
> +                        !server->ops->is_oplock_break(buf, server)) {
>                       cERROR(1, "No task to wake, unknown frame received! "
>                                  "NumMids %d", atomic_read(&midCount));
>                       cifs_dump_mem("Received Data is: ", buf,
>                                     HEADER_SIZE(server));
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2
> -                     server->ops->dump_detail(buf);
> +                     if (server->ops->dump_detail)
> +                             server->ops->dump_detail(buf);
>                       cifs_dump_mids(server);
>  #endif /* CIFS_DEBUG2 */
>  

Looks fine for now. Eventually you might want to make dump_detail
mandatory, in which case you could eliminate the second check.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to