On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 07:15 +0530, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
> The double delimiter check that allows a comma in the password parsing code is
> unconditional. We set "tmp_end" to the end of the string and we continue to
> check for double delimiter. In the case where the password doesn't contain a
> comma we end up setting tmp_end to NULL and eventually setting "options" to
> "end". This results in the premature termination of the options string and 
> hence
> the values of UNCip and UNC are being set to NULL. This results in mount 
> failure
> with "Connecting to DFS root not implemented yet" error.
> 
> This error is usually not noticable as we have password as the last option in
> the superblock mountdata. But when we call expand_dfs_referral() from
> cifs_mount() and try to compose mount options for the submount, the resulting
> mountdata will be of the form 
> 
>    ",ver=1,user=foo,pass=bar,ip=x.x.x.x,unc=\\server\share"
> 
> and hence results in the above error. This bug has been seen with older NAS
> servers running Samba 3.0.24.
> 
> Fix this by moving the double delimiter check inside the conditional loop.
> 
> Changes since -v1
> 
>    - removed the wrong strlen() micro optimization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sachin Prabhu <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/connect.c |   32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> index 78db68a..5b38407 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> @@ -1653,24 +1653,26 @@ cifs_parse_mount_options(const char *mountdata, const 
> char *devname,
>                        * If yes, we have encountered a double deliminator
>                        * reset the NULL character to the deliminator
>                        */
> -                     if (tmp_end < end && tmp_end[1] == delim)
> +                     if (tmp_end < end && tmp_end[1] == delim) {
>                               tmp_end[0] = delim;
>  
> -                     /* Keep iterating until we get to a single deliminator
> -                      * OR the end
> -                      */
> -                     while ((tmp_end = strchr(tmp_end, delim)) != NULL &&
> -                            (tmp_end[1] == delim)) {
> -                             tmp_end = (char *) &tmp_end[2];
> -                     }
> +                             /* Keep iterating until we get to a single
> +                              * deliminator OR the end
> +                              */
> +                             while ((tmp_end = strchr(tmp_end, delim))
> +                                     != NULL && (tmp_end[1] == delim)) {
> +                                             tmp_end = (char *) &tmp_end[2];
> +                             }
>  
> -                     /* Reset var options to point to next element */
> -                     if (tmp_end) {
> -                             tmp_end[0] = '\0';
> -                             options = (char *) &tmp_end[1];
> -                     } else
> -                             /* Reached the end of the mount option string */
> -                             options = end;
> +                             /* Reset var options to point to next element */
> +                             if (tmp_end) {
> +                                     tmp_end[0] = '\0';
> +                                     options = (char *) &tmp_end[1];
> +                             } else
> +                                     /* Reached the end of the mount option
> +                                      * string */
> +                                     options = end;
> +                     }
>  
>                       /* Now build new password string */
>                       temp_len = strlen(value);

Another way would have been to leave the earlier optimisation in place
but simply reset temp_len within the if condition. This means the second
strlen was called only in case we had encountered a double delimiter in
the password.

In any case, this code is called only once at mount time and hence the
optimisation is not terribly important in this case.

Acked-by: Sachin Prabhu <[email protected]>

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to