On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:39:50 +0400 Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov...@samba.org> wrote:
> +#define STATUS_GUARD_PAGE_VIOLATION 0x80000001 > +#define STATUS_DATATYPE_MISALIGNMENT 0x80000002 > +#define STATUS_BREAKPOINT 0x80000003 > +#define STATUS_SINGLE_STEP 0x80000004 > +/* #define STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW 0x80000005 */ > +#define STATUS_NO_MORE_FILES 0x80000006 > +#define STATUS_WAKE_SYSTEM_DEBUGGER 0x80000007 > +#define STATUS_HANDLES_CLOSED 0x8000000A > +#define STATUS_NO_INHERITANCE 0x8000000B > +#define STATUS_GUID_SUBSTITUTION_MADE 0x8000000C Well, on the plus side, you did comment out STATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW which was a definite conflict with the definitions in the SMB1 status code list. However...I'm fairly certain that there are other conflicts here, so that was just an example. You really have two choices here: 1) make smb2status.h and nterr.h be mutually exclusive. Ensure that you never #include both files. At first glance, this may be easy, but the trick will be to ensure that no one does this in the future. 2) rename all of these error codes such that they do not conflict with the SMB1 errors. This is more certain to ensure that you don't have problems, but it's a bigger change. I really don't care which one you choose, but we really do need to take steps to ensure that we do not get conflicts here. -- Jeff Layton <jlay...@samba.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
