On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2012/9/27 Steve French <[email protected]>:
>> merged into cifs-2.6.git (along with the other two in this
>
> What do you think about Cc'ing it to [email protected] as well?

I don't think it is necessary but if you think a problem is
reproducible let me know.  In the case where

           resp_buf_type == CIFS_NO_BUFFER

then we have iov pointing to the original request and therefore

    smb_buf->Status.CifsError ==
                        cpu_to_le32(NT_STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED

will never be true  Your code (adding the check for resp_buf_type)
makes it cleaner and better, but  I don't see how we can end up
oopsing or falling into this section of code accidentally with the
previous version.
-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to