kernel_sendmsg() is less likely to return -ENOSPC and it might be
a bug to do so. However, in the past there might have been cases
where a -ENOSPC was returned from a low level driver.

Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() to ensure that it is safe to assume that -ENOSPC
is no longer returned. This -ENOSPC specific handling will be removed
once we are sure it is no longer returned.

Also, avoid setting -ENOSPC to -EAGAIN while at it.

Cc: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <[email protected]>
---
 fs/cifs/transport.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c
index d9b639b..afe000f 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/transport.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c
@@ -155,6 +155,10 @@ smb_sendv(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec 
*iov, int n_vec)
                rc = kernel_sendmsg(ssocket, &smb_msg, &iov[first_vec],
                                    n_vec - first_vec, total_len);
                if ((rc == -ENOSPC) || (rc == -EAGAIN)) {
+                       /*
+                        * Catch if a low level driver returns -ENOSPC.
+                        */
+                       WARN_ON_ONCE(rc == -ENOSPC);
                        i++;
                        /*
                         * If blocking send we try 3 times, since each can block
@@ -177,7 +181,6 @@ smb_sendv(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec *iov, 
int n_vec)
                        if ((i >= 14) || (!server->noblocksnd && (i > 2))) {
                                cERROR(1, "sends on sock %p stuck for 15 
seconds",
                                    ssocket);
-                               rc = -EAGAIN;
                                break;
                        }
                        msleep(1 << i);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to