On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2013 13:21:06 -0500 > Steve French <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I sent a merge request for the setops fix, the other five in your >> for-3.10 are queued in the for-3.10 branch (and for-3.11 branch there >> are five more in for-3.11 from your longer series that I have already >> reviewed and put in - note that this for-3.11 branch is soon to be >> called "for-next" so linux-next will be building it) >> >> In the series of patches for-3.10 I did fix up two formatting errors >> that checkpatch noticed: >> > > Thanks for fixing those. > >> I have reviewed 3 of the 5 of your most recent patches in for-3.10, >> but would appreciate more review especially on the two larger ones >> ("fix error handling ..." and "fix composing ...") in that series. >> > > Ok...
cifs-2.6.git for-next is fixed up to look like a "for-3.11" branch. There also is still a for-3.10 with the five patches I know about for-3.10 still - if you know of any others that should go in for-3.10 let me know. Perhaps the removexattr patch might be one for example. -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
