On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve, Thanks. But I think what we have here itself needed to > changed as per Jeff Layton's comments. He is suggesting > and I do agree and was working on invoking respective crypto > algorithms per smb, smb2.1, and smb3 signing instead of > invoking all of them per any kind of signing. > > Changing signing for smb2.1 and smb3 from per smb connection > to smb session is somewhat non-trivial but I do plan to work on that > piece of code once I am back.
I actually don't think it looks that bad - Jeff's cifs auth rewrite, makes this much easier. -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
