On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:39:41 +0200
Sebastian Krahmer <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Prefer snprintf() over sprintf() in cifskey.c
> Projects that fork the code (pam_cifscreds) can't rely on
> the max-size parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Krahmer <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> 
> --- cifskey.c.orig    2014-04-08 13:10:41.653435040 +0200
> +++ cifskey.c 2014-04-14 11:19:07.000118206 +0200
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@
>  {
>       char desc[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN + sizeof(KEY_PREFIX) + 4];
>  
> -     sprintf(desc, "%s:%c:%s", KEY_PREFIX, keytype, addr);
> +     if (snprintf(desc, sizeof(desc), "%s:%c:%s", KEY_PREFIX, keytype, addr) 
> >= (int)sizeof(desc))
> +             return -1;
>  
>       return keyctl_search(DEST_KEYRING, CIFS_KEY_TYPE, desc, 0);
>  }
> @@ -38,15 +39,18 @@
>  key_serial_t
>  key_add(const char *addr, const char *user, const char *pass, char keytype)
>  {
> -     int len;
> +     int len = 0;

This initialization doesn't appear to be needed.

>       char desc[INET6_ADDRSTRLEN + sizeof(KEY_PREFIX) + 4];
>       char val[MOUNT_PASSWD_SIZE +  MAX_USERNAME_SIZE + 2];
>  
>       /* set key description */
> -     sprintf(desc, "%s:%c:%s", KEY_PREFIX, keytype, addr);
> +     if (snprintf(desc, sizeof(desc), "%s:%c:%s", KEY_PREFIX, keytype, addr) 
> >= (int)sizeof(desc))
> +             return -1;
>  
>       /* set payload contents */
> -     len = sprintf(val, "%s:%s", user, pass);
> +     len = snprintf(val, sizeof(val), "%s:%s", user, pass);
> +     if (len >= (int)sizeof(val))
> +             return -1;
>  
>       return add_key(CIFS_KEY_TYPE, desc, val, len + 1, DEST_KEYRING);
>  }
> 
> 

I think we probably need to clean up the error handling in the callers
of these functions, but that's a separate problem. I'll go ahead and
merge this, and we can do that in a separate patch.

-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to