On 09/24, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/24/2015 05:46 PM, York Sun wrote:
> >+                    /* may have some garbage in high bits,
> >+                     * will be cut of by mask
> >+                     */
> 
> Does the clock subsystem use network subsystem style multiline comments ?

No. We follow the traditional multi-line commenting style as in
Documentation/CodingStyle.

> >+            return ret;
> >+    }
> >+
> >+    /* Check if si5338 exists */
> >+    if ((n & REG5338_DEV_CONFIG2_MASK) != REG5338_DEV_CONFIG2_VAL) {
> >+            dev_err(&client->dev,
> >+                    "Chip returned unexpected value from reg %d: %d, 
> >expected %d. It is not %s\n",
> 
> 0x%x for register values ?

Or %#x

> 
> >+                    REG5338_DEV_CONFIG2, n, REG5338_DEV_CONFIG2_VAL,
> >+                    id->name);
> >+            return -EIO;
> >+    }
> >+
> >+    dev_info(&client->dev, "Chip %s is found\n", id->name);
> 
> I personally dislike that noise.
> 

Me too.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to