On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:49:04PM +0200, Borgström Jonas wrote: > Yes, both "fence_drac ..." and "fence_node test-db1.example.com" works. > > The strange thing is that during the test I described earlier it looks like > the cluster didn't even try to fence the failed node. /var/log/messages > didn't mentioning anything about trying to fence any node. And neither did > "group_tool dump fence". > > And even if something would be wrong with the fence_drac configuration > wouldn't fence_manual kick in instead?
Yes. Also, it looks like fencing did not "quietly" complete - since rgmanager never recovered (failed-over) the service from the dead node. If a node dies unexpectedly, rgmanager waits until cman has finished fencing that node before initiating a failover. That's why it was still reported as 'started' on the dead node in the clustat output. -- Lon -- Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc. -- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
