On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I really think so: I always used 'gfs' in my command lines, never
'gfs2' ...; gfs_fsck runs well on that filesystem, while gfs2_fsck returns:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# gfs2_fsck /dev/vg_share/lv_share_1
Initializing fsck
Old gfs1 file system detected.
That seems fairly conclusive.
To make my doubts even greater, I noticed (with my great surprise) that my
gfs kernel module is using the gfs2 kernel module:
That's normal. Confusing, but normal. It surprised me, too, when I first
noticed.
I'd greatly appreciate your sharing your working GFS1 configuration with me,
if it's possible.
Sure, but it'll be a couple of days before my cluster is up and running
again.
Gordan
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
