You will still need some way to tell the system through which interface you want to route outgoing packets for each target. You can achieve the same with greater ease by splitting the network in 2 subnets and assigning each to a single interface. It all depends on the problem you are trying to solve. If you want redundancy - use active-passive bonding, you want throughput - use active-active bonding (if your switch supports link aggregation), if you want security and isolation - use separate subnets.
-Alex 2008/3/12 Brian Kroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is a hypothetical, but what if you have two interfaces on the same > network and want to force one service IP to one interface and the other > to a different interface? I think what everyone is wondering is how > much control one has over the service IP placement. > > Thanks, > Brian > > Finnur Örn Guðmundsson - TM Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-12 14:36: > > > > Hi, > > > > I see no reason why you could not have 3 diffrent interfaces, each > connected to the networks you are trying to serve the NFS requests to/from. > RG Manager will add the floating interfaces to the "correct" interface, that > is, if your floating ip is 1.2.3.4 and you have a interface with the IP > address 1.2.3.3 he will add the IP to that interface. > > > > > > Bgrds, > > Finnur > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > > Sent: 12. mars 2008 14:10 > > To: linux clustering > > Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Two node NFS cluster serving multiple networks > > > > Sounds very similar to what I'm trying to achieve (see the other thread > > about binding failover resources to interfaces). I've not seen a response > > yet, so I'm most curious to see if you'll get any. > > > > Gordan > > > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Randy Brown wrote: > > > > > I am using a two node cluster with Centos 5 with up to date patches. We > have > > > three different networks to which I would like to serve nfs mounts from > this > > > cluster. Can this even be done? I have interfaces available for each > > > network in each node? > > > > -- > > Linux-cluster mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > > -- > > Linux-cluster mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
