Thanks kevin and Bob for the information. When can we expect GFS2 for production?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Brett Cave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/8/18 Anuj Singh (अनुज) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello everyone, > > I created a cluster on rhel5, > > To make the gfs1 file system I used following command. > > > > ' gfs_mkfs -t new_cluster:GFS -p lock_dlm -j2 /dev/MyVol0/MyLV0' > > > > Mounted /dev/MyVol0/MyLV0 on /image. > > 'mount -t gfs /dev/MyVol0/MyLV0 /image ' > > No error I got. > > > > Mount command gives me. > > /dev/mapper/MyVol0-MyLV0 on /image type gfs > > (rw,hostdata=jid=0:id=131073:first=1) > > > > My questions: > > 1) How to prove that I have gfs1 file system in use. > > 2) Ismod |grep gfs gives me. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] CL]# lsmod |grep gfs > > gfs 252740 1 > > gfs2 341965 2 gfs,lock_dlm > > configfs 28753 2 dlm > > 3) rmmod gfs2 > > ERROR: Module gfs2 is in use by gfs,lock_dlm > > ^^ why gfs2 module is in use? > > as lock_dlm is associated with gfs2, does it mean it's not production > ready? > > from Bob Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > to linux clustering <[email protected]> > date Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:59 PM > subject Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS vs. GFS2: system-config-cluster, locking > ... > > FYI--For 5.x, the locking infrastructure was common between GFS > and GFS2. It has to do with the common lock harness "lock_dlm" > that is an interface between both GFS and GFS2 into the "dlm" module. > For 5.3, we're splitting the locking modules apart to get rid of > that dependency. > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
