gfs_sda1 1 1 0 wz--n- 10.00G 5.00G gfs_sdb1 1 1 0 wz--n- 10.00G 3.50G
The vg's are not enabled with the cluster bit. I am sorry for not being more informative on LVM. If I enable cluster bit with vgchange -c command would that convert the volumes to cluster volume group, or should I start by blowing them away? On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Bob Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ----- "Alan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | I have been able to recreate the problem with gfs_grow. Here is the > | output > | of the test command, and the actual command, with the > | /var/log/messages - > | all from the node3. I am opening ticket with RH, and will give you > | the > | ticket number afterwards. > | > | > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# gfs_grow -v -T /lvm_test2 > > Hi Alan, > > This is helpful, thanks. Please check that the clustered > bit is "on" for your volume group. If you do the "vgs" > command, it should show "wz--nc" under "Attr" for the volume > group. If not, (if it shows "wz--n-") it would explain your > problem, because it needs to be on. So please, double-check > for me. If the clustered bit is not on, the other nodes are not > informed by lvm of the resize that took place, so when gfs_grow > informs them of the file system size change, things don't go > well. :7) > > If the volume group is indeed clustered, it would help me a lot > to get a complete history of these commands pertaining to your GFS > volume: > > lvcreate > lvresize or lvextend > mount > umount > gfs_mkfs or mkfs.gfs > gfs_fsck > gfs_grow > > You might be able to grep these from the "history" command. > I just now created a logical volume of a similar size, and I was > able to do a gfs_grow on it without any problems, hangs or > consequences. I must be doing something different, so I want > to make sure I hit the same conditions you hit by using the > exact same commands, if possible. Otherwise, I'll have to > try a bunch of combinations and it may take be days to hit > the right combination. > > Also, let me know what kind of activity was happening on the > other nodes while you were doing gfs_grow. Not detailed; I > just want to know if the other nodes were likely to have been > writing to the file system. > > Regards, > > Bob Peterson > Red Hat Clustering & GFS > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Alan A.
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
