Could you mention please, the benchmarks you are using? Thanks,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Alain.Moulle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > We have executed some benchs on gfs2, gfs compared to ext3 and ocfs2 > and the results are (just some examples): > > * Read on 1 file : > quite the same performance > > * Write on 1 file : > > quite the same performance > > * Creation of many many files and repertories : > gfs2 is 10 times less good than ext3 and ocfs2 > > * Write of a file tree followed by 4 reading process : > gfs and gfs2 : 40 mn > ocfs2 : 3 mn > > Does it seem normal for you ? or is there some hidden tuning somewhere to > increase > performances when using gfs2 (or gfs) ? > > Thanks a lot. > Regards. > Alain > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
