Hello, these are the logs I get:
In node1: May 21 11:33:44 NODE1 fenced[3840]: NODE2 not a cluster member after 5 sec post_fail_delay May 21 11:33:44 NODE1 fenced[3840]: fencing node "NODE2" May 21 11:33:44 NODE1 shutdown[5448]: shutting down for system halt in node2: May 21 11:33:45 NODE2 fenced[3843]: NODE1 not a cluster member after 5 sec post_fail_delay May 21 11:33:45 NODE2 fenced[3843]: fencing node "NODE1" May 21 11:33:45 NODE2 shutdown[5923]: shutting down for system halt what I don´t know is way they lose the connection with the cluster, they are still connected (I only unplug a cable from the service network) Thanks, ESG 2009/5/21 Jonathan Brassow <[email protected]> > > On May 21, 2009, at 6:44 AM, ESGLinux wrote: > > Hello, >> >> I continue with my 2 node cluster and with strange behaviours (or >> not....). >> >> I´ll explain the actual situation. >> >> I have a cluster with 2 nodes. I Use IPMI as fencing device and all works >> fine. >> >> I have two separate networks for the services and for the cluster >> management. (as I was instructed in this list, thanks for the advice ;-) ) >> >> I use a iscsi volumen mounted on the two nodes and with GFS on it. >> >> The problem I have now is that when one of the nodes lose the connection >> to the service network (I disconnect the cable from the interface) I expect >> the second node fence this node and take the control of the services. But >> what I have is that the 2 nodes halt, (no reboot, halt), is this normal? >> >> one detail, the access to the GFS volumen is through this service network. >> When I pull the cable I lose the connection to it. Can be this the problem? >> > > What do your logs say? Was fencing ever attempted? completed? Are you > pulling the connection that allows for IPMI communication? > > brassow > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
