Thanks all for your answers I´m going to try DRBD with all the indications you gave me.
I´m going to spend a good summer time. ;-) ESG 2009/6/25 Gordan Bobic <[email protected]> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:40:51 -0400, Jeff Sturm <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:15:56 +0200, ESGLinux <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > ok, I´m always afraid with data corruption and thougth I will have > >> > problems with this, but If you think that there is not problem I´ll > >> > folow your advice ( at my own risk of course, ;-) > >> > >> NFS is designed for concurrent access, it shouldn't cause corruption. > And > >> anyway, your apache web data is likely to be read-only in most cases > >> anyway. Don't put things like database files into shared access areas, > >> though - that generally won't work, and even when it does, performance > >> will > >> be appalling. > > > > Or if you still want the redundancy of RHCS and go the DRBD route, you > can > > always use the shared device for backups. (That's the ONLY thing I use > NFS > > for these days.) > > Don't underestimate NFS performance for heavily concurrent I/O with a > significant write load on lots of small file from multiple nodes. There are > things for which NFS is a better solution. > > Gordan > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
