On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Tom Lanyon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18/05/2009, at 11:38 PM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > The fix has gone in to RHEL 5.4. I have a feeling that it might also go >> into 5.3.z but I'm not 100% sure what the timescales are there. The bug >> is known and fixed in upstream too. >> >> It isn't actually using any more CPU, its just that the LA is >> incremented by 1. So a fix is already on its way, >> >> Steve. >> > > > Great, we experience this bug too. It doesn't cause any problems but > confuses some of the administrators... :) > It's currently fixed in 5.3 Many thanks! > > Tom > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
