Hi! How can I unsubscribe ? Best Regards, Itshak
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 7:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 68, Issue 14 Send Linux-cluster mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Linux-cluster digest..." Today's Topics: 1. 2 pptp links on two hosts (Jakov Sosic) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:50:09 +0100 From: Jakov Sosic <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [Linux-cluster] 2 pptp links on two hosts Message-ID: <1260985809.2168.6.ca...@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi. I have two pptp links on two hosts. Hosts are frontends (gateways, firewalls, NAT) for some network. Hosts also must be gateways for all the VLANs. Now, two things in this case can fail - one host, or for example it's pptp route, in which case again gateway and static routes should be transferred to the secondary node. Is there a way to solve this with RHCS, or is there any more appropriate software for this kind of failover? My initial idea when I heard the problem was to write something like init script, which in status part pings some address behind PPTP link, and if ping is OK, than service is considered OK. Now, if for some reason ping fails, status wouldn't be 0, and RHCS would apply relocate policy, stop the script on primary and start it on secondary. stop function would delete all the routes, and start would set appropriate static routes. RHCS itself would take care of the floating address of the gateway. I wonder if you have any experience with this kind of setup, or any ideas if this could be done in any better way? Thank you. -- | Jakov Sosic | ICQ: 28410271 | PGP: 0x965CAE2D | ================================================================= | | ------------------------------ -- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster End of Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 68, Issue 14 ********************************************* -- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
