--- On Thu, 5/20/10, Dustin Henry Offutt <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Dustin Henry Offutt <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Using ping as a heuristic not a great idea?
To: "linux clustering" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, May 20, 2010, 9:42 AM




  
Same experience.



In addition, best practice is to make the quorum partition its own
physical disk, and admittedly this is not best practice, but instead
took a slice of SAN RAID so as not to waste a whole precious disk plus
one for mirroring for what is essentially a 20MB partition - and fibre
traffic would upset Qdiskd's vote.



Again, what I was doing was not best practice, and if a qdisk partition
is needed it's definitely worth the two physical disks. 



In conclusion, no, I wouldn't use ping heuristics.

what if you use a dedicated and separated network for cluster communication 
(and heuristic)
transferring a big file over the data interfaces should not make any effect in 
the internal network

even a crossover cable could/should help here 

and you should have a very slow switch/network if by transferring a single 
file, although big, make you lose ping packages

thanks
roger

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

Reply via email to