Martin, A thousand most sincere gratitudes.
This is *exactly* what we need (I'm presuming this attribute looks for an interface labeled "eth0" (from your example) and applies that 192 address to it....?). Testing immediately!!! If you have a moment, from whence did you find this attribute? On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Martin Waite <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > > > /usr/share/cluster/ip.sh appears to perform the link-monitoring in the > "status" command, which is called periodically. I don't know that either > rgmanager or cman or other cluster software are directly involved in that. > > > > The "ip" configuration already supports an "interface" attribute: > > > > <ip address="192.168.2.120" interface="eth0" monitor_link="1"/> > > > > > > regards, > > Martin > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Dustin Henry Offutt > *Sent:* 14 June 2010 13:15 > *To:* [email protected] >> linux clustering > *Subject:* Re: [Linux-cluster] Higher Grained Definition of IP > AddressAssignments? > > > > Appreciate the info, but indeed what we need is HA. > > I need to perhaps request if a cluster developer would be willing to add a > new configuration item to the IP xtag within the cluster.conf configuration > that would allow one to specify IP an IP label to apply the IP resource to. > > This *could* be done via a cluster resource script - but then we'd lose > the ability to have the cluster software monitor the link and relocate the > service should the link be lost. > > Kit Gerrits wrote: > > Hello, > > > > What you want sounds more like Load Balancing than HA Clustering. > > > > I would suggest building a lvs load balancing cluster with 10.1.1.x as > front-end IP and 10.1.2 as backend IP. > > Make the LVS the default gateway for your 'cluster servers' > (realservers), then configure 1-.1.1.50 on your LVS cluster as Virtual IP > with the 10.1.2.x realservers as backend using NAT routing. > > > > Documentation isa vailable at: > > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/ > > or, more specifically: > > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-NAT.html > > > > LVS should be included in Red Hat Advanced Platform. > > > > Yes, running a LoadBalancing cluster means 2 more servers and 2 more > subscriptions, but it will allow for highly-available Load Balancing. > > (implicitly allowing you to take realservers offline for maintenance) > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Kit Gerrits > > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
