GFS2 isn't the only way to get live Xen migration. If it's simpler, you can implement CLVM on shared storage, and use logical volumes to contain disk images. Your cluster infrastructure will ensure consistency of volume group metadata and still provide for domain failover.
-Jeff From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of yue Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:59 PM To: Andrew Beekhof Cc: cluster-devel; linux clustering Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] hi,question about gfs2 1.hi, i do not know fc12 unsupported in less than 2 months now my environment is fc12 2.if there are rpm ,rpm is good. 3.i want gfs2 to host xen image-disk. 100G--200G image file. and need xen live migration amoung gluster. i do not know gfs2's performance. thanks ---------------- At 2011-02-22 20:39:33，"Andrew Beekhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >2011/2/22 yue <[email protected]>: >> 1.if i can deploy gfs2 on fedora12. > >Why would you do that? Isn't F-12 unsupported in less than 2 months? > >> if it is ok to build from source code >> ? >> 2.the max node gfs2 can manger? i use san, if i have 100 machines,if gfs2 >> can work over those nodes? >> >> thanks >> >> >> -- >> Linux-cluster mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >>
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
