Depends on the application's use of the filesystem and your processing usage patterns. You should evaluate both.
We're using 8gbit FC and 1gb private networking between two pairs (test & production) of 4-node clusters on IBM BladeCenter. We used RHEL 4 GFS from 2007 - 2010 without issue. Upgraded to RHEL 5u5, then most of the GFS filesystems to GFS2 without issues (yet). We'd like to see a working cluster configuration using GFS2 on KVM guests. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of yue Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:14 AM To: linux-cluster Subject: [Linux-cluster] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2? which is better gfs2 and ocfs2? i want to share fc-san, do you know which is better? stablility,performmance? thanks
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
