I am curious why the designers of RHEV V3.0 did not use GFS2 for their shared 
storage.  It seems that this would be a natural choice.  Instead RHEV 3.0 
allows either NFS or raw shared LUNs, I believe.

Anybody has some thoughts on this subject?

Thanks and regards,

Chris Jankowski

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

Reply via email to