dont take any error
and yes removed the method from command (default is onoff)
exact line is at below:
<fencedevice agent="fence_ipmilan" ipaddr="192.168.11.68" lanplus="1"
login="clsfenceadmin" name="fence_node1" passwd="clsfenceadmin" power_wait="4"
verbose="true"/>
and I tested fencing using manually (making a kernel crash:Digimer note)
and command with fence_node node1 .
İt worked and services is relocated properly
thanks
________________________________
From: Heiko Nardmann <heiko.nardm...@itechnical.de>
To: linux-cluster@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] fencing issue in 2 nodes cluster
Am 03.08.2012 09:12, schrieb AKIN ÿffffffffffd6ZTOPUZ:
Hi
>
>thanks all repilies
>
> I added verbose parameter into fence agent line in cluster.conf according to
>Heiko (verbose="true",method="onoff")
>and I read the web link sent by Digimer .I tested fencing using "echo c
>> /proc/sysrq-trigger" on node1.
>after that I saw fencing occured and related services moved to other node
>properly.
>
>in this case can we say , fencing is ok ? or also should I use
>fence_node command on node for being sure?
>
>
>
No errors anymore? Did you reduce the number of parameters as
Digimer suggested? Then it would be maybe interesting for others to
see your working fence configuration as configured inside
cluster.conf.
I would suggest to test a little bit too much than doing not enough
testing ... ;-) ... debugging afterwards is more costly than doing
testing before ...
So my recommendation would be to test that manually started fencing,
too, to see whether any messages/errors appear.
After that you are probably fine ...
Kind regards,
Heiko
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster