On Jan 20, 2014, at 5:21 AM, Jürgen Ladstätter <i...@innova-studios.com> wrote:
> is anyone running gfs2 with kernel version 2.6.32-431 yet? 358 was unusable > due to bugs, 279 was working quite well. Anyone tested the new 431? Is it > stable enough for a productive environment? 358 actually works okay for us, so YMMV. 431 we found to be unusable under heavy load--any kind of backup-like activity would cause large load fluctuations, high glock_workqueue activity, and frequent fencings. The one cluster where we rely heavily on GFS2 lasted 5 days (with ~8 fencings) on 431 before we backed off to 358. Dunno when we'll have the time to investigate further, we do need a better simulation of our production loads on our test cluster. -dan -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
