On 12/03/2015 06:14 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 03/12/15 02:19 PM, Kelvin Edmison wrote:
I am hoping that someone can help me understand the problems I'm having
with linux clustering for VMs.
I am clustering 2 VMs on two separate VM hosts, trying to ensure that a
service is always available. The hosts and guests are both RHEL 6.7.
The goal is to have only one of the two VMs running at a time.
The configuration works when we test/simulate VM deaths and graceful VM
host shutdowns, and administrative switchovers (i.e. clusvcadm -r ).
However, when we simulate the sudden isolation of host A (e.g. ifdown
eth0), two things happen
1) the VM on host B does not start, and repeated fence_xvm errors appear
in the logs on host B
2) when the 'failed' node is returned to service, the cman service on
host B dies.
If the node's host is dead, then there is no way for the survivor to
determine the state of the lost VM node. The cluster is not allowed to
take "no answer" as confirmation of fence success.
If your hosts have IPMI, then you could add fence_ipmilan as a backup
method where, if fence_xvm fails, it moves on and reboots the host itself.
Thank you for the suggestion. The hosts do have ipmi. I'll explore it
but I'm a little concerned about what it means for the other
non-clustered VM workloads that exist on these two servers.
Do you have any thoughts as to why host B's cman process is dying when
'host A' returns?
Thanks,
Kelvin
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
