Hi Herbert,

On 01.12.2017 11:36, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:18:30AM +0100, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
>>
>> Herbert, is it possible for every init/update that areq->result can be NULL,
>> and only for final/update/digit user set it to actual memory ?
>> testmgr.c can check if hash update writes into areq->result and if yes, 
>> then test fails ?
> 
> Yes we should modify testmgr to check that.

I can write patch for it. Should it WARN_ON or treat it as error ?

-- 
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

Reply via email to