Thus wrote Wei Yongjun (weiyongj...@huawei.com):
> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> drivers/char/hw_random/imx-rngc.c:303:1: warning:
> symbol 'imx_rngc_pm_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongj...@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/hw_random/imx-rngc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/imx-rngc.c
> b/drivers/char/hw_random/imx-rngc.c
> index eca8724..250123b 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/imx-rngc.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/imx-rngc.c
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused imx_rngc_resume(struct device
> *dev)
> return 0;
> }
> -SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(imx_rngc_pm_ops, imx_rngc_suspend, imx_rngc_resume);
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(imx_rngc_pm_ops, imx_rngc_suspend, imx_rngc_resume);
> static const struct of_device_id imx_rngc_dt_ids[] = {
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx25-rngb", .data = NULL, },
You're right. The vast majority of other drivers uses a
static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(), so should we.
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <mar...@kaiser.cx>
