On 06/03/18 04:57 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 12:48:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <log...@deltatee.com> wrote:
Clean up the ifdefs which conditionally defined the io{read|write}64
functions in favour of the new common io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi header.

  #include <linux/kthread.h>
  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
  #include <linux/ntb.h>
+#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>

A nit, can we preserve alphabetical ordering?

Ugh, why, it doesn't matter at all :)

I'm fine with either way, but ordering is a good thing to have in long
term prospective.
Easy to find what headers are in there, easy to understand if you need
another one or not, easy to maintain the list w/o duplications.

I saw already few examples where long list of headers contained
duplications b/c it was in messy order.

I agree with Greg here. This is a bit silly. The list isn't even alphabetical to begin with so it can't be preserved. However, if I do a v12 I'll make it alphabetical.


Reply via email to