Hi all,

On 10/9/18 12:20 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The original intention is to allocate space for EIP197_DEFAULT_RING_SIZE
>> *pointers* to struct, so sizeof(priv->ring[i].rdr_req) should be
>> sizeof(*priv->ring[i].rdr_req).
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1473962 ("Sizeof not portable")
>> Fixes: 9744fec95f06 ("crypto: inside-secure - remove request list to improve 
>> performance")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> 


Friendly ping. Who can take this?

Thanks!
--
Gustavo

Reply via email to