Re: [BUG][PATCH] arm64: bti: fix BTI to handle local indirect branches

Jeremy Linton Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:25:15 -0700

Hi,

On 10/5/20 1:54 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 20:18, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com> wrote:


The AES code uses a 'br x7' as part of a function called by
a macro, that ends up needing a BTI_J as a target.


Could we instead just drop the tail call, i.e, replace it with a ret
and do a 'bl' after it returns? The indirect call does not really
serve a purpose here anyway

Yes, that is an option, it adds an extra ret. Which probably doesn'tmean much in most cases. I assumed this code was optimized this waybecause it mattered somewhere.

Lets
define SYN_CODE_START_LOCAL() for this and replace the
SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL with a SYM_FUNC_CODE_LOCAL in the AES block.

^ That should have readSYM_CODE_START_LOCAL.


Without this kernels compiled with the aes_neon_bs will OOPS
at boot.

   Bad mode in Synchronous Abort handler detected on CPU1, code 0x34000003 -- 
BTI
   CPU: 1 PID: 265 Comm: cryptomgr_test Not tainted 5.8.11-300.fc33.aarch64 #1
   pstate: 20400c05 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO BTYPE=j-)
   pc : aesbs_encrypt8+0x0/0x5f0 [aes_neon_bs]
   lr : aesbs_xts_encrypt+0x48/0xe0 [aes_neon_bs]
   sp : ffff80001052b730
   x29: ffff80001052b730 x28: 0000000000000001
   x27: ffff0001ec8f4000 x26: ffff0001ec5d27b0
   x25: ffff0001ec8f4000 x24: ffff80001052bc00
   x23: 0000000000000018 x22: 000000000000000a
   x21: ffff0001ec5d2100 x20: ffff0001ec8f4080
   x19: ffff0001ec8f4000 x18: 0000000000000004
   x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffadb4db85d310
   x15: 0000000000000200 x14: 0000000000000010
   x13: 0000000000000200 x12: ffff0001ec5d2100
   x11: 000000000000000a x10: 0000020000200000
   x9 : ffffadb4db7e7488 x8 : 0000000000000000
   x7 : ffffadb4614fb110 x6 : 0000000000000000
   x5 : ffff80001052bc00 x4 : 0000000000000020
   x3 : 000000000000000a x2 : ffff0001ec5d2100
   x1 : ffff0001ec8f4000 x0 : ffff0001ec8f4000
   Kernel panic - not syncing: bad mode
   CPU: 1 PID: 265 Comm: cryptomgr_test Not tainted 5.8.11-300.fc33.aarch64 #1
   Call trace:
    dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0
    show_stack+0x24/0x30
    dump_stack+0xc0/0x118
    panic+0x144/0x358
    arm64_serror_panic+0x0/0x98
    el1_sync_handler+0x60/0x110
    el1_sync+0xb4/0x180
    aesbs_encrypt8+0x0/0x5f0 [aes_neon_bs]
    __xts_crypt+0xb0/0x2dc [aes_neon_bs]
    xts_encrypt+0x28/0x3c [aes_neon_bs]
   crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x50/0x84
   simd_skcipher_encrypt+0xc8/0xe0
   crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x50/0x84
   test_skcipher_vec_cfg+0x224/0x5f0
   test_skcipher+0xbc/0x120
   alg_test_skcipher+0xa0/0x1b0
   alg_test+0x3dc/0x47c
   cryptomgr_test+0x38/0x60
   kthread+0x11c/0x120
   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
  SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
  Kernel Offset: 0x2db4cb7e0000 from 0xffff800010000000
  PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffcf2440000000
  CPU features: 0x7e0152,20c02020
  Memory Limit: none
  ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: bad mode ]---

Fixes: commit 0e89640b640d ("crypto: arm64 - Use modern annotations for assembly 
functions")
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>
---
  arch/arm64/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S | 8 ++++----
  arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h    | 6 +++++-
  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S 
b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S
index b357164379f6..76de87ee80e1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-neonbs-core.S
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(aesbs_convert_key)
  SYM_FUNC_END(aesbs_convert_key)

         .align          4
-SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(aesbs_encrypt8)
+SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(aesbs_encrypt8)
         ldr             q9, [bskey], #16                // round 0 key
         ldr             q8, M0SR
         ldr             q24, SR
@@ -488,10 +488,10 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(aesbs_encrypt8)
         eor             v2.16b, v2.16b, v12.16b
         eor             v5.16b, v5.16b, v12.16b
         ret
-SYM_FUNC_END(aesbs_encrypt8)
+SYM_END(aesbs_encrypt8)

         .align          4
-SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(aesbs_decrypt8)
+SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(aesbs_decrypt8)
         lsl             x9, rounds, #7
         add             bskey, bskey, x9

@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(aesbs_decrypt8)
         eor             v3.16b, v3.16b, v12.16b
         eor             v5.16b, v5.16b, v12.16b
         ret
-SYM_FUNC_END(aesbs_decrypt8)
+SYM_END(aesbs_decrypt8)

         /*
          * aesbs_ecb_encrypt(u8 out[], u8 const in[], u8 const rk[], int 
rounds,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h
index ba89a9af820a..92c81ae8ac1e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
   * set the architecture version to v8.5 we use the hint instruction
   * instead.
   */
-#define BTI_C hint 34 ;
+#define BTI_C  hint 34 ;
+#define BTI_JC hint 38 ;

  /*
   * When using in-kernel BTI we need to ensure that PCS-conformant assembly
@@ -42,6 +43,9 @@
         SYM_START(name, SYM_L_WEAK, SYM_A_NONE)         \
         BTI_C

+#define SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(name)                     \
+       SYM_START(name, SYM_L_LOCAL, SYM_A_ALIGN)       \
+       BTI_JC
  #endif

  /*
--
2.25.4

Re: [BUG][PATCH] arm64: bti: fix BTI to handle local indirect branches

Reply via email to