Hi Jarkko,

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:40:48AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 05:05:14PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > This patch adds the logic for parsing the CodeSign extended key usage
> > extension in X.509. The parsing result will be set to the eku flag
> > which is carried by public key. It can be used in the PKCS#7
> > verification.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <j...@suse.com>
> > ---
> >  crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/crypto/public_key.h               |  1 +
> >  include/linux/oid_registry.h              |  5 +++++
> >  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c 
> > b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > index 52c9b455fc7d..65721313b265 100644
> > --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c
> > @@ -497,6 +497,8 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
> >     struct x509_parse_context *ctx = context;
> >     struct asymmetric_key_id *kid;
> >     const unsigned char *v = value;
> > +   int i = 0;
> > +   enum OID oid;
> >  
> >     pr_debug("Extension: %u\n", ctx->last_oid);
> >  
> > @@ -526,6 +528,28 @@ int x509_process_extension(void *context, size_t 
> > hdrlen,
> >             return 0;
> >     }
> >  
> > +   if (ctx->last_oid == OID_extKeyUsage) {
> > +           if (v[0] != ((ASN1_UNIV << 6) | ASN1_CONS_BIT | ASN1_SEQ) ||
> > +               v[1] != vlen - 2)
> > +                   return -EBADMSG;
> > +           i += 2;
> > +
> > +           while (i < vlen) {
> > +                   /* A 10 bytes EKU OID Octet blob =
> > +                    * ASN1_OID + size byte + 8 bytes OID */
> > +                   if (v[i] != ASN1_OID || v[i + 1] != 8 || (i + 10) > 
> > vlen)
> > +                           return -EBADMSG;
> > +
> > +                   oid = look_up_OID(v + i + 2, v[i + 1]);
> > +                   if (oid == OID_codeSigning) {
> > +                           ctx->cert->pub->eku |= EKU_codeSigning;
> > +                   }
> > +                   i += 10;
> > +           }
> > +           pr_debug("extKeyUsage: %d\n", ctx->cert->pub->eku);
> 
> With eBPF around, does this make any sense?
>

I think that the dynamic debug log is still easier for checking the EKU
setting.

Thanks
Joey Lee

Reply via email to