On 2/9/26 15:40, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <[email protected]> > > nommu architectures have empty_zero_page and define ZERO_PAGE() and > although they don't really use it to populate page tables, there is no > reason to hardwire !MMU implementation of is_zero_pfn() and my_zero_pfn() > to 0. > > Drop #ifdef CONFIG_MMU around implementations of is_zero_pfn() and > my_zero_pfn() and remove !MMU version. > > While on it, make zero_pfn __ro_after_init. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <[email protected]> -- Cheers, David
