On 7/13/26 14:17, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: >> To me, the double READ_ONCE() is a non-issue. > To other arch maintainers, it is!
Ahh, so it seems like Christophe in ppc32 land was looking at this more like a regression that needed to get fixed. Christophe, just out of curiosity, was this something that was causing you practical problems like measurable performance regressions, or was it really just insane code generation that seems unacceptably suboptimal?
