Linux-Development-Sys Digest #766, Volume #6      Wed, 2 Jun 99 15:14:27 EDT

Contents:
  Re: HELP with interfacing PCs with Macs thorugh linux (Bernd Strieder)
  Re: What are the differences between mySQL and mSQL? (bryan)
  Re: Developing device drivers for Linux... (Gerd Rausch)
  Re: POSIX msgQ's and timers for Linux? ("G. Sumner Hayes")
  .h files missing for Make Config in Redhat (Jonathan DelStrother)
  Re: make xconfig errors (Alex Rhomberg)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Bernd Strieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP with interfacing PCs with Macs thorugh linux
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 19:04:22 +0200

Hi

"..Luca T.." wrote:
> 
> I'm setting a LAN server on LINUX platform in my company and i would like to
> interface PC (with windows98) and Macintosh passing through the server.
> I can make PINGS to all the machines and i can make ftp from all the
> browsers i have in the LAN.
> So, the question is: how can i make visible PCs with MACs (passin through
> linux) ?

If you want all the PCs and MACs listed in one list like SAMBA offers
for PCs, and all PCs and MACs talking to each other then you would have
a problem Linux cannot solve, AFAIK. The PCs talk to Linux and to each
other through the SMB-protocol. The MACs talk to Linux and to each other
by their own protocol. So there is either the chance that you run the
SMB-protocol on the MACs or you run the MAC's protocols on the PCs. If
you can't do this, you have to restrict to the PCs talking to each other
and to Linux and the MACs talking to each other and to Linux. So your
problem is more likely a PC or MAC problem.

I can't imagine that anybody tries to build a proxy that wraps a MAC
network into a SAMBA network, and/or vice versa a PC network into the
MAC network. Perhaps there are some developers of SAMBA or the MAC
protocols around to say something about this being possible at all or to
which degree it is possible or if this has been done. I'm sure this
would be a major problem, combining those of both worlds and newly
creating a lot more.

Try to find the SMB-protocol for your MACs. Does SAMBA run on MACs? I
don't know MACs enough.

Try to find software for your PCs that allows access to MACs. This is
more likely.

Linux can be server of common resources like printers or filespace for
both worlds independently from the problem if PCs and MACs can talk one
to another.

HTH

Bernd Strieder

------------------------------

From: bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What are the differences between mySQL and mSQL?
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.lang.java.databases
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 17:24:35 GMT

In comp.os.linux.development.apps Arnout Kuiper wrote:
: Hi,

: On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 03:10:35 +0200 , Ruiming Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: wrote:

: >
: >The Subject askes its all. Are they the same free database software with
: >two names?
: >Or they are two different free database software?
: >Are they both run on Linux?
: >
: >Thank you!
: >--Raymond

: They are two different databases:

: mSQL (Mini SQL) : http://www.hughes.com.au/
: mySQL : http://www.tcx.se/

: They both can run under Linux, and are alike with respect to offered
: functionality, although I heard that MySQL is slightly better.

: You might consider PostgreSQL (http://www.postgresql.org/), which is
: in my humble opinion one of the better free databases.

it has this nasty bug about the last column being a string - I forget the details but 
I ended up going with mysql
since it has worked for me bug-free for over 2 yrs in a production env.

but it lacks bells and such.  no stored procs and no triggers.



-- 
Bryan

------------------------------

From: Gerd Rausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Developing device drivers for Linux...
Date: 02 Jun 1999 09:40:32 +0200

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Willamowius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

    Jan> "Chris White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
    >> I need to develop a device driver for a pointing device which connects to
    >> the PS/2 port.  However, due to proprietary algorithms that I am unable to
    >> release in source code form, [...]

    Jan> My advice would be
    Jan> a.) think again, if you really can't distribute source - once you get
    Jan>     bugreports it's so much nicer when people mail you the cause instead of
    Jan>     the symptom

That usually doesn't happen. Most people will keep sending you good
advice like what _you_ should change, because _they_ want it that way.
Additionally you'll get many bug reports from people who can't compile
the package just because they can't handle it, which doesn't keep them
from trying. (``Ohh, I need a C-compiler to install the package ? What
is a compiler ?'')

But still, it's well worth the additional effort, as many people gain
from getting the source-code. Just that you never hear anything back
from them ;-)

Regards,

  Gerd

-- 
voice: +49-2407-575-353
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: "G. Sumner Hayes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: POSIX msgQ's and timers for Linux?
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 13:13:23 -0400



Greg Owen Walker wrote:
> 
> Does Linux currently support POSIX message queues and
> POSIX timers?
> 
> That is, does Linux support mq_send(), mq_receive(),
> timer_settime(), etc?

No.  It's on the agenda, but not being actively developed AFAIK.
Commonly used IPC either uses the SysV stuff(ugh) or pipes/sockets/
mmap() shm for communication and select/poll or queued real-time
signals (completion ports) or fcntl for syncronization.

--Sumner

------------------------------

From: Jonathan DelStrother <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: .h files missing for Make Config in Redhat
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 09:12:15 +0100

hiya

First things first - there's probably a post very similar to this about
to pop up on the server - in a frenzy of Ctrl-V pressing down below I
must of pressed Ctrl-Enter, which Netscape kindly assumes means that you
want to post your message...Oooops
Anyways
I've been trying to persuade sound to work in Redhat 5.2 - go to the
src/linux/drivers/sound dir, type make config...& i get the following
error:
configure.c: 19: stdio.h: No such file or directory
configure.c: 20: unistd.h: No such file or directory
configure.c: 21: stdlib.h: No such file or directory
configure.c: 22: fcntl.h: No such file or directory
configure.c: 23: string.h: No such file or directory

Anyone know where I can find those files? I've looked all over the
packages in the CD, but haven't found anything...

Cheers
Jonathan
[Terminal Newbie]

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 10:29:52 +0200
From: Alex Rhomberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: make xconfig errors

Arkadiy Korobeyko wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody!
> 
> At some stage of updating packages (RH5.2 -> 6.0) I lost possibility
> in compiling kernel with 'make xconfig'
> Errors are:
> 
> tkparse.c:37: stdio.h: No such file or directory
> tkparse.c:38: stdlib.h: No such file or directory
> tkparse.c:39: string.h: No such file or directory
>   [tkparse.o] Error 1
> 
> What is missing ?


glibc-devel rpm???

- Alex

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.development.system) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Development-System Digest
******************************

Reply via email to