Linux-Development-Sys Digest #720, Volume #7     Thu, 30 Mar 00 21:13:17 EST

Contents:
  Re: Free BSD ("Peter T. Breuer")
  Re: 2.3.99pre3 - still won't compile (Paul Vojta)
  RFD: comp.os.linux.embedded (John Peterson)
  Re: latest 2.3.99-pre3 won't boot on I-OPENER (Ronald Cole)
  RedHat 6.1 and 3Com HomeConnect PC Digital Camera (USB), anyone? (Ronald Cole)
  Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH (Paul Kimoto)
  Re: 2.3.99pre3 - still won't compile (bill davidsen)
  Re: 2.3.99: what's next step? (bill davidsen)
  Floppy problems. (Derrick Moser)
  Re: latest 2.3.99-pre3 won't boot on I-OPENER (Bryan)
  Re: Embedded Systems Development ("Spehro Pefhany")
  Re: Embedded Systems Development ("Spehro Pefhany")
  Mini Install ("tiberiusmaximus")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Free BSD
Date: 30 Mar 2000 22:20:01 GMT

Warren Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: "Peter T. Breuer" wrote:
:> 
:> FreeBSD is spelled differently and is written by different people
:> and has a different licence and different objectives and a different
:> development model.
:> 
:> Does that answer your question? If not, please explain to me the
:> advantages of using BeOS instead of Plan9.

: Did I accidentally stumble into rec.humor.funny while looking for Linux
: info?

I dunno. What's the advantage of rec.humor.funny over c.o.l.d.s?

Peter

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Vojta)
Subject: Re: 2.3.99pre3 - still won't compile
Date: 30 Mar 2000 14:41:13 -0800

In article <8bvn1a$kd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I don't expect beta kernels to be solid, but if the release team doesn't
>care enough about quality to check that it compiles...

Yes it does compile (under the configuration that I use).  It most likely
also compiles under the configurations that lots of other people use.
What you probably meant to say was:

        2.3.99pre3 - still won't compile under my configuration

or

        2.3.99pre3 - still won't compile under all configurations

My response to the second is that there are just too many valid
configurations to check, even on an automated basis.

My response to the first is unprintable.

--Paul Vojta, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
Paul Vojta, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: John Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,comp.os.linux.portable,comp.arch.embedded,comp.dsp,comp.os.linux.announce
Subject: RFD: comp.os.linux.embedded
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:43:33 GMT

                     REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
               unmoderated group comp.os.linux.embedded

This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of a
world-wide unmoderated Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.embedded. This
is not a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this time.
Procedural details are below.

Newsgroup line:
comp.os.linux.embedded  Linux operating system on embedded hardware.

RATIONALE: comp.os.linux.embedded

It is becoming apparent that the Linux operating system has a
very bright future in the area of embedded applications; internet
appliances, wireless internet access, personal digital assistants,
television set top boxes, medical instruments, dedicated control
systems, etc. The potential for the growth of Linux in this area is
highlighted by the fact that roughly 95% of all newly manufactured
microcomputer chips are used for embedded applications.

Industry has already embraced Linux for use in embedded applications
for several reasons. The cost of licensing a commercial operating
system and the power of the open source development model are some
of the more prominent ones.  The TiVo personal video recorder,
and the Empeg MP3 car player are two examples of consumer products
that utilize embedded Linux. Samsung has recently announced plans to
market the world's first Linux based PDA, named Yopy. Sony already
uses Linux based systems for developing applications for it's
Playstation2 game machine. The industry has further demonstrated
it's commitment to Linux by the recent announcement of the formation
of the Embedded Linux Consortium (ELC). It will consist of roughly
50 member companies including IBM, Lineo, Motorola and Red Hat.

Linux development has historically been oriented toward desktop
and server applications and the current comp.os.linux.* hierarchy
largely reflects this heritage. The unique nature of the technical
issues of using Linux for embedded applications, and the potential
for enormous growth are the two main reasons for the proposal of
this new Usenet newsgroup.

There will be some overlap of the charter of the proposed group
will that of the existing comp.os.linux.portable newsgroup. This
is unavoidable since some embedded devices are designed with the
intent to provide portable computing resources of a rather general
nature (PDAs for example). However, the universe of embedded devices
that would not be classified as a portable computer is very large
(e.g. TV set top boxes, medical instruments). It is the contention of
the proponent that the proposed group is sufficiently disjoint from
the existing comp.os.linux.portable newsgroup that the efficiency
and viability of both groups would not be negatively impacted.

Topics related to the use of Linux on embedded processors are
already frequently discussed in several existing Usenet newsgroups
and mailing lists. Statistics for such postings during the period
from Jan 1, 2000 to Jan 31, 2000 are shown in the table below. The
Usenet statistics were gathered using "Power" keyword searches
from the Deja search engine at http://www.deja.com/home_ps.shtml

  Newsgroup / Mailing List         Posts     Search Keyword
  ========================         =====     ====== =======
  comp.arch.embedded                 151     "Linux"
  comp.dsp                            41     "Linux"
  comp.realtime                       24     "Linux"
  comp.os.linux.development.system    17     "embedded"
  comp.os.linux.hardware               8     "embedded"
  uclinux mailing list               135     N.A.
                                     ---
  Total Postings                     376

  Average / Day                       12     (376/31)

CHARTER: comp.os.linux.embedded

The proposed newsgroup is intended to be a public forum for the
discussion of the development and use of the Linux operating system
on embedded hardware platforms. Topics considered appropriate for
posting to the group might include (but are not limited to);

  o Software Related Topics

    + Embedded Linux distributions (e.g. Lineo Embedix, Mobile Linux)
    + Software APIs for embedded Linux development (e.g. Cygnus EL/IX)
    + Development of user applications for embedded Linux
    + Integrated Development Environments for embedded Linux

  o Hardware Related Topics

    + Linux based emulators and debuggers for embedded hardware
    + Existing Linux support for specific hardware
    + Development of device drivers for embedded Linux

Topics that might appear welcome on the surface, but in fact are not
include; general questions about embedded hardware with no reference
to Linux, questions about embedded or real time programming that
are not specific to Linux, such as "What is multithreading?", or
"What is a deadlock?", etc.

One time postings of commercial product announcements or postings of
a commercial nature that are replies to another posted inquiry will
be considered appropriate. However, as in most other Usenet groups,
repeated or in-discriminant posting of commercial advertisements will
be prohibited. Postings using MIME, HTML formats are discouraged
since many Usenet readers do not use web browsers. The posting of
source code and binaries for the purpose of distribution shall be
prohibited. However, a small snippet of source code or a small patch
would be considered acceptable.

END CHARTER.

PROCEDURE:

This is a request for discussion, not a call for votes. In this phase
of the process, any potential problems with the proposed newsgroups
should be raised and resolved. The discussion period will continue
for a minimum of 21 days (starting from when the first RFD for this
proposal is posted to news.announce.newgroups), after which a Call For
Votes (CFV) may be posted by a neutral vote taker if the discussion
warrants it. Please do not attempt to vote until this happens.

All discussion of this proposal should be posted to news.groups.

This RFD attempts to comply fully with the Usenet newsgroup creation
guidelines outlined in "How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup" and "How
to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal". Please refer to these
documents (available in news.announce.newgroups) if you have any
questions about the process.

DISTRIBUTION:

This RFD has been posted to the following newsgroups:

  news.announce.newgroups
  news.groups
  comp.os.linux.announce
  comp.os.linux.development.system
  comp.os.linux.portable
  comp.arch.embedded
  comp.dsp

This RFD has been posted to the following mailing lists;

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (discussion of Linux on systems without a MMU)

       To subscribe, send a mail message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         with 'subscribe uclinux' in the body of the mail message

Proponent: John Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: latest 2.3.99-pre3 won't boot on I-OPENER
Date: 30 Mar 2000 15:00:34 -0800

Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but here's the weird part: when I use the stock slackware 7.0 kernel
> (2.2.13, as build by slackware and untouched by me) the system boots
> AND you see textmode come up after the screen freaks out a bit ;-) the
> bootup msgs can be read after the first few lines have come out.

Why don't you examine the slackware 7.0 distribution and locate the
.config file that Patrick used to build the kernel?

-- 
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA  93556-1412
Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>      Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO                             Fax: (760) 499-9152
My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084  4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B

------------------------------

From: Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: RedHat 6.1 and 3Com HomeConnect PC Digital Camera (USB), anyone?
Date: 30 Mar 2000 15:09:38 -0800

Ok, on an impulse I bought the 3Com USB PC camera.  I've looked for
documentation and/or HOWTOs for connecting it to my pc running RH6.1,
but have been unsuccessful.

About the only thing I've been able to figure out is that RH6.1
doesn't appear to support USB "out of the box".

I refuse to believe that I'm going to have to wait until RedHat
releases a linux-2.4 distribution (RH7.x?), or that I'm going to have
to resort to Win98 and Netmeeting to get some use out of it.

Can anyone who's connected a USB camera to their PC and gotten it
working with RH6.1 offer me some pointers?  Thanks!

-- 
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA  93556-1412
Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>      Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO                             Fax: (760) 499-9152
My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084  4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Date: 30 Mar 2000 18:40:58 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pjtg0707 wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 18:57:18 GMT, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Environment variables don't have default values; perhaps you are looking
>> for the default library search path? That would be in your /etc/ld.so.conf

> Is there something similar for the include search path as well?

[This is all off-topic for c.o.l.d.system.]

The default is built in to the compiler.  Run
$ gcc -v -S -o /dev/null -xc /dev/null
to see it.

By the way, LD_LIBRARY_PATH and /etc/ld.so.conf affect the dynamic linker
(i.e., the runtime part), not ld(1) (the compile-time part).

-- 
Paul Kimoto             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: 2.3.99pre3 - still won't compile
Date: 31 Mar 2000 00:07:13 GMT


In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Kimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| In article <8bvn1a$kd6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bill davidsen wrote:
| >  gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 
|-fomit-frame-pointer  -pipe -fno-strength-reduce     -c -o ip_fw_compat_masq.o 
|ip_fw_compat_masq.c
| >  ip_fw_compat_masq.c: In function `do_masquerade':
| >  ip_fw_compat_masq.c:63: structure has no member named `nat'
| >  ip_fw_compat_masq.c:37: warning: `info' might be used uninitialized in this 
|function
| >  ip_fw_compat_masq.c: In function `check_for_demasq':
| >  ip_fw_compat_masq.c:162: structure has no member named `nat'
| >  make[3]: *** [ip_fw_compat_masq.o] Error 1
|
| I don't think you need the netfilter "compat" options.

  Have a realtime packet app, rewrote it from ipfwadm kernel interface,
though this might make it run in 2.4.

  Thanks for the hint, compiles fine without the compat, but the app
doesn't run.

--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
  The hardest test of maturity is knowing the difference between
resisting temptation and missing a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
  "Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979"(tm)

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: 2.3.99: what's next step?
Date: 31 Mar 2000 00:36:30 GMT


In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Aki M Laukkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

| Some of the patches got lost in the netfilter merge, big deal. I think they
| are now in pre4-1. You should understand one thing about the development
| kernels. Compilation is only tested/if at all with the configuration
| Linus uses.

  There is a difference between alpha test, beta test and
pre-production. At least in a real commercial software development
shop, or a well run university environment.

  Linux has perhaps the best development team around, but but they do
code stuff without doing design first, and they not only don't do QA
before letting out code, they rejected an offer to have a group do it
when a new release was ready. I tried, not going to try again.

--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
  "Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979"(tm)
Restructure Microsoft into two equal parts. Let one code with 1's and
one code with 0's.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derrick Moser)
Subject: Floppy problems.
Date: 31 Mar 2000 00:19:22 GMT

I have been using the 2.2.14 kernel for a while but this week my
floppy drive has gone into a weird state.

I use the mtools packages a lot.  I have been using them with 2.2.14 for
over a month without a problem.  But this week I have a problem reading
from floppies.  I haven't rebooted since this problem started so I can
experiment with this bug if someone wants to look into this.

I have no problem copying a file to a floppy with the mtools.  (I can
read these files from the disk on a different computer).  But when I try
to copy a file from floppy to my hard drive, the first 512 bytes are
corrupt.  These 512 bytes happen to be the first 512 bytes in the file
that was most recently copied to a floppy.

Right now I can:
  1) insert floppy A
  2) use mcopy to copy file "foo.txt" to floppy A
  3) replace floppy A with floppy B
  4) use mcopy to copy file "bar.txt" from floppy B

The first 512 bytes of the new file "bar.txt" on my hard drive will have
the same first 512 bytes as "foo.txt".

If I then try to use "dd" to make an image of disk B.  I will see those
corrupt 512 bytes starting from location 0x00004200.  The rest of the
disk image looks ok (I haven't verified all of it).


------------------------------

From: Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: latest 2.3.99-pre3 won't boot on I-OPENER
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 01:26:27 GMT

In comp.os.linux.development.system Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > but here's the weird part: when I use the stock slackware 7.0 kernel
: > (2.2.13, as build by slackware and untouched by me) the system boots
: > AND you see textmode come up after the screen freaks out a bit ;-) the
: > bootup msgs can be read after the first few lines have come out.

: Why don't you examine the slackware 7.0 distribution and locate the
: .config file that Patrick used to build the kernel?

you know, that DID occur to me ;-) I guess I'll go do that since at
least two folks think that's a good idea.

still, the better approach is to find out what magic is needed to put
that funky screen into normal vga text mode, then send that sequence
to the driver before the kernel gets too far in booting.  I bet
someone will figure it out soon, given the popularity of the
linux-hack (and *bsd hacks) to the i-opener.

-- 
Bryan, http://Grateful.Net (ANTISPAM: email is my name at my web's domain)

(c) 2000.  Publishing and/or relaying of this material on all forums other than
USENET implies agreeing to a consultancy fee of US$150 per posting.  You must
obtain a written permit before you publish.  Violators are subject to civil
prosecution for Copyright Infringement as applicable.  Publication by C|NET 
and Microsoft Networks expressly prohibited.

------------------------------

From: "Spehro Pefhany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Embedded Systems Development
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 02:04:10 GMT

The renowned Accutrol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> the subject at hand.  Does anyone know of a site that maintains links to
> information that might help me make an informed decision?  BTW, I'm not
> exactly on the fence;  I'm leaning toward Linux.  I just need a little
> encouragement.

Hi, Bill 
I'm accumulating some links to such things on my site at:

http://www.BlueCollarLinux.com

You'd probably be particularly interested in the Puffin and EMC links. 
Best regards, 
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the reward"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Contributions invited->The AVR-gcc FAQ is at: http://www.BlueCollarLinux.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

------------------------------

From: "Spehro Pefhany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Embedded Systems Development
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 02:04:52 GMT

The renowned Accutrol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> the subject at hand.  Does anyone know of a site that maintains links to
> information that might help me make an informed decision?  BTW, I'm not
> exactly on the fence;  I'm leaning toward Linux.  I just need a little
> encouragement.

Hi, Hamilton- 
I'm accumulating some links to such things on my site at:

http://www.BlueCollarLinux.com

You'd probably be particularly interested in the Puffin and EMC links. 
Best regards, 
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the reward"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Contributions invited->The AVR-gcc FAQ is at: http://www.BlueCollarLinux.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

------------------------------

From: "tiberiusmaximus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mini Install
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 20:00:21 -0800

What's the best embedded flavor out there?




------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.development.system) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Development-System Digest
******************************

Reply via email to