Linux-Development-Sys Digest #798, Volume #7 Tue, 25 Apr 00 11:16:27 EDT
Contents:
Re: Ctl-Alt-Del (scott)
GLIBC 2 - Which version. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: MS caught breaking web sites (Robin)
Re: Porting our compiler to Linux ("Norman Black")
read ext2fs from dos/wiindows ("Robert L.")
Re: read ext2fs from dos/wiindows ("Robert L.")
Re: read ext2fs from dos/wiindows (terry)
Re: GLIBC 2 - Which version. (Kaz Kylheku)
Re: read ext2fs from dos/wiindows ("Robert L.")
Unregelm��iger Verbindungsabbau mit kppp ("Bj�rn")
Any validating XML Parsers? (M Sweger)
Re: SIGACTION (Andi Kleen)
Re: GLIBC 2 - Which version. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: MS caught breaking web sites (Mike Marion)
SB drivers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: GLIBC 2 - Which version. (Art Haas)
Re: GLIBC 2 - Which version. (Robie Basak)
Home PNA Support (dtdcovey)
Re: Any validating XML Parsers? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
What does this mean? ("Michael")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ctl-Alt-Del
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 17:30:08 GMT
Sake wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to disable the Ctl-Alt-Del ?
> I'm building a system and I don't want it to
> be rebooted by anybody pressing Ctl-Alt-Del .
>
> e-main response would be great
> Thanks in advance.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
Make a /etc/shutdown.allow file and put the users names in there that you
want to be able to do a shutdown. (Or it might be called reboot.allow.)
Just add the users names one per line. You don't need to add root. If you
make the file, but don't add any names, then no one but root can do it.
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GLIBC 2 - Which version.
Date: 24 Apr 2000 18:43:27 GMT
Hey all,
For various reasons, I'm trying to get glibc 2 - a.k.a. libc 6 - installed
on my box. What is the latest stable version? According to the HOWTO on
www.linux.org, 2.0.6 is the example. However, various 2.1.x versions are
available on ftp.gnu.org, and something I read someplace refers to v2.1 as
the "next stable release".
I'm running a very old version of Slackware, so RPMs aren't going to help.
I was planning on compiling it, but when I got glibc-2.1.3.tar.gz and the
latest glibc-crypt, glibc-linuxthreads, and glibc-localedata from ftp.gnu.org
it failed the 'make'.
Ideas/suggestions?
--J
------------------------------
From: Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: MS caught breaking web sites
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 14:53:41 -0400
Gary Connors wrote:
> Corporate Workstation is NOT a desktop.
> Second I NEVER once claimed NT is "not fit to be a workstation". There is
> a difference between workstation and desktop. Workstations you get work
> done on, desktops are for solitare, web browsing, and balancing your
> checkbook.
REALLY? I guess I've really been screwing up these last couple years, what with all
that checkbook balancing I've done on my NT desktop (although it sits *under* my
desk, not on the *top*... does it still count?) As the "computer geek friend
everybody calls when they can't get their machine to work right" I'd recommend NT
over 9x (no 2000 experience yet) to a home user in a heartbeat.
------------------------------
From: "Norman Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: Porting our compiler to Linux
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:17:39 -0700
Reply-To: "Norman Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It would be nice to have an object oriented M2 compiler that produced
> Windows and Unix code from the same source, but I'm not sure if that is
> a goal Mr. Black has in mind.
If you are referring to a portable GUI library, then yes and no. We have one
which use under windows. It obviously is not yet ported to X, Gtk, Qt or
whatever. The GUI encapsulation is not object oriented. The encapsulation is
not a full boat, meaning it does not encapsulate everything, only what we
use in our applications. We wrote the library for ourselves, not as library
for distribution. As such we add features as needed to the encapsulation.
The source for this encapsulation is available in the distribution.
--
Norman Black
Stony Brook Software
To reply via email reverse the identifiers in the domain.
William Burrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:08:11 GMT,
> Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >There is a GNU Modula 2 compiler. I've never used it so I can't vouch for
> >any of its attributes such as installation ease, completeness, etc.
>
> My recollection is that it is dead, but for the OS/2 crowd so desperate
> for a native compiler that they resurrected it somewhat. Check the
> comp.lang.modula2 archives on deja (if deja still does newsgroups, they
> seem to be confused about why they exist last I looked).
>
> Stony Brook and XDS are the only two Modula-2 compilers at the top of
> the heap. Both are commercial. GPM and Mocka are not bad and are
> available for Linux, but are not in the same league.
>
> It would be nice to have an object oriented M2 compiler that produced
> Windows and Unix code from the same source, but I'm not sure if that is
> a goal Mr. Black has in mind.
>
> --
> William Burrow -- New Brunswick, Canada o
> Copyright 2000 William Burrow ~ /\
> ~ ()>()
------------------------------
From: "Robert L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: read ext2fs from dos/wiindows
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:34:39 GMT
Can it be possible to read the Linux partition from windows?
Presently, windows can't even see them.
Is it going to be possible if someone make a driver for ext2fs ?
If availlable, where can we get the spec. of the ext2 file system.
Thanks.
P.S. Partition Magic can read/write those partition. So it's certainly
posible to read a file from there...
------------------------------
From: "Robert L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: read ext2fs from dos/wiindows
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:43:10 GMT
Excuse me, i ask too soon.
I find it at freashmeat.
( unfortunely, my e-mail server don't accept the deletion of message. )
Robert L. a �crit dans le message ...
>Can it be possible to read the Linux partition from windows?
>Presently, windows can't even see them.
>Is it going to be possible if someone make a driver for ext2fs ?
>
>If availlable, where can we get the spec. of the ext2 file system.
>
>Thanks.
>
>P.S. Partition Magic can read/write those partition. So it's certainly
>posible to read a file from there...
>
>
------------------------------
From: terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: read ext2fs from dos/wiindows
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:45:58 -0400
"Robert L." wrote:
>
> Can it be possible to read the Linux partition from windows?
> Presently, windows can't even see them.
> Is it going to be possible if someone make a driver for ext2fs ?
>
> If availlable, where can we get the spec. of the ext2 file system.
>
> Thanks.
>
> P.S. Partition Magic can read/write those partition. So it's certainly
> posible to read a file from there...
There are several utilities that allow you to read a Linux partition
from windows. The one I use is called explore2fs.
http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/
It has an interface similar to windows explorer.
Terry
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaz Kylheku)
Subject: Re: GLIBC 2 - Which version.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:49:56 GMT
On 24 Apr 2000 18:43:27 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey all,
>
>For various reasons, I'm trying to get glibc 2 - a.k.a. libc 6 - installed
>on my box. What is the latest stable version? According to the HOWTO on
>www.linux.org, 2.0.6 is the example. However, various 2.1.x versions are
>available on ftp.gnu.org, and something I read someplace refers to v2.1 as
>the "next stable release".
>
>I'm running a very old version of Slackware, so RPMs aren't going to help.
>I was planning on compiling it, but when I got glibc-2.1.3.tar.gz and the
>latest glibc-crypt, glibc-linuxthreads, and glibc-localedata from ftp.gnu.org
>it failed the 'make'.
>
>Ideas/suggestions?
My suggestions would be to see whether the glibc FAQ solves your build problem.
If not, you may want to ask in a glibc mailing list like glibc-linux.
Lastly, you might just want to just upgrade your Slackware to Slackware 7,
which comes with glibc-2.1.2. I've had no problems compiling glibc on
Slackware 7.
In fact, I've been lately compiling bleeding edge glibc sources that are
destined to become glibc 2.2. ;)
--
#exclude <windows.h>
------------------------------
From: "Robert L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: read ext2fs from dos/wiindows
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:55:16 GMT
Thanks. Is the one i use right now.
I find it ~5 minutes after i ask it.
terry a �crit dans le message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>"Robert L." wrote:
>>
>> Can it be possible to read the Linux partition from windows?
>> Presently, windows can't even see them.
>> Is it going to be possible if someone make a driver for ext2fs ?
>>
>> If availlable, where can we get the spec. of the ext2 file system.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> P.S. Partition Magic can read/write those partition. So it's certainly
>> posible to read a file from there...
>
>There are several utilities that allow you to read a Linux partition
>from windows. The one I use is called explore2fs.
>
> http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/
>
>It has an interface similar to windows explorer.
>
>Terry
------------------------------
From: "Bj�rn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Unregelm��iger Verbindungsabbau mit kppp
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 22:35:52 +0200
Hallo,
ich m�chte meine verbindung�(isdn) zu meinem provider �ber kppp aufbauen.
die verbindung wird auch aufgebaut, aber nach unregelm��igen abst�nden,
zwischen 30 sek. und 2 min, wird die verbindung wieder unterbrochen. der
pppd meldet:
==============================================================
Apr 8 17:44:57 bjoern pppd[3340]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Apr 8 17:44:57 bjoern pppd[3340]: Using interface ppp0
Apr 8 17:44:57 bjoern pppd[3340]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyI0
Apr 8 17:44:57 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x717c56b4> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x717c56b4> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00>
<mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4>
< 13 0b 01 53 54 41 43 4b 2d 4d 45>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00> <
11 04 05 f4> < 13 0b 01 53 54 41 43 4b 2d 4d 45>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x717c56b4> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1524>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x2 <auth pap>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <mru 1524>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x3 <mru 1524>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1
user="XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" password="XXXXXXXXXXXX"]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 ""]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: Remote message:
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 0.0.0.0>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <compress VJ 0f
01> <addr 139.4.112.165>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0x1 <compress VJ 0f
01>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
149.225.63.75>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
149.225.63.75>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
139.4.112.165>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x2 <addr
192.168.0.1>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr
149.225.63.75>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <addr
192.168.0.1>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 <addr
192.168.0.1>]
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: local IP address 149.225.63.75
Apr 8 17:45:00 bjoern pppd[3340]: remote IP address 192.168.0.1
Apr 8 17:45:22 bjoern pppd[3340]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Apr 8 17:45:22 bjoern pppd[3340]: Modem hangup
Apr 8 17:45:22 bjoern pppd[3340]: Connection terminated.
Apr 8 17:45:22 bjoern pppd[3340]: Exit.
==============================================================
es ist wahrscheinlich nicht die idle time, da die verbindung unregelm�ssig
getrennt wird.
es ist auch egal, ob ich daten �ber die leitung schicke oder nicht.
wenn ich die verbindung �ber �ber yast, mit ippp0 realisiere bleibt die
verbindung bestehen.
ich hoffe das ihr mir helfen k�nnt.
thanks bjoern
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M Sweger)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Any validating XML Parsers?
Date: 24 Apr 2000 20:38:38 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm looking for a "validating" free XML parser which validates agains't
the DTD or the XML schema. I know about SAX, but it isn't a validating one;
nor are any of the Perl ones I've come across.
BTW, is there such a thing as a "validating" XLT transformation tool too?
What would be a good XLT tool?
Thanks for any info and leads to one.
--
Mike,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: SIGACTION
Date: 24 Apr 2000 23:51:17 +0200
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> accion.sa_sigaction = trat_segv ;
> sigemptyset(&accion.sa_mask);
> accion.sa_flags = SA_RESTART | SA_NOCLDSTOP | SA_ONSTACK | SA_SIGINFO
> ;
> sigaction(SIGSEGV, &accion, NULL);
SA_SIGINFO is only implemented for real time (SIGRTMIN<=sig<=SIGRTMAX)
signals on Linux 2.2. Yes this is Single Unix compliant. There are patches
to implement SA_SIGINFO for SIGSEGV, but they're not in the standard kernel.
You have no alternative to using sigcontext_struct ATM.
-Andi
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GLIBC 2 - Which version.
Date: 24 Apr 2000 21:44:24 GMT
Upgrading the whole distro is not the way I tend to go, based on the fact that
I spend a lot of time customizing the install, and all of those customizations
go away when you reinstall. Takes weeks to get it back to "normal".
I made it from a.out -> ELF w/o a reinstall, I can do this. :-)
Anyway, it looks like I needed to upgrade make from 3.76.1 to 3.77 patched.
Having done that, the compile looks like it's going more smoothly. Doing
that and following the glibc2 HOWTO should (hopefully) get me through safely.
But I used glibc-2.1.3.tar.gz, glibc-crypt-2.1.tar.gz,
glibc-linuxthreads-2.1.3.tar.gz, and glibc-localedata-2.0.6.tar.gz (most
recent listed) and configure seemed to like that. We'll see how that
goes with a fixed make.
Just offhand, anybody know where I can get the source to rpm? I found
rpms for make 3.79, but I don't have the util.
--J
Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On 24 Apr 2000 18:43:27 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>Hey all,
:>
:>For various reasons, I'm trying to get glibc 2 - a.k.a. libc 6 - installed
:>on my box. What is the latest stable version? According to the HOWTO on
:>www.linux.org, 2.0.6 is the example. However, various 2.1.x versions are
:>available on ftp.gnu.org, and something I read someplace refers to v2.1 as
:>the "next stable release".
:>
:>I'm running a very old version of Slackware, so RPMs aren't going to help.
:>I was planning on compiling it, but when I got glibc-2.1.3.tar.gz and the
:>latest glibc-crypt, glibc-linuxthreads, and glibc-localedata from ftp.gnu.org
:>it failed the 'make'.
:>
:>Ideas/suggestions?
: My suggestions would be to see whether the glibc FAQ solves your build problem.
: If not, you may want to ask in a glibc mailing list like glibc-linux.
: Lastly, you might just want to just upgrade your Slackware to Slackware 7,
: which comes with glibc-2.1.2. I've had no problems compiling glibc on
: Slackware 7.
: In fact, I've been lately compiling bleeding edge glibc sources that are
: destined to become glibc 2.2. ;)
: --
: #exclude <windows.h>
------------------------------
From: Mike Marion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: MS caught breaking web sites
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 21:51:03 GMT
Robin wrote:
> REALLY? I guess I've really been screwing up these last couple years, what with all
> that checkbook balancing I've done on my NT desktop (although it sits *under* my
> desk, not on the *top*... does it still count?) As the "computer geek friend
Yeah it's getting to be a pain.. we need new classes: Tower, desktop,
laptop...etc. In the end, they're all just computers.
My mom still calls the whole case the CPU, I can't convince her that the CPU is
just the chip.
> everybody calls when they can't get their machine to work right" I'd recommend NT
> over 9x (no 2000 experience yet) to a home user in a heartbeat.
Unless playing any recent game is desired.
--
Mike Marion - Unix SysAdmin/Engineer, Qualcomm Inc.
ftp://127.0.0.1 ..... That site sucks. I've already got all of that stuff!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SB drivers
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 22:49:33 +0000
Hi,
I'm relatively new to the Linux platform and I was wondering if anyone
could tell me where I'd find drivers for my SB Awe 64? I don't know if
it makes any difference, but I'm running Slackware.
Thanks,
Briano.
------------------------------
From: Art Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GLIBC 2 - Which version.
Date: 24 Apr 2000 16:51:15 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Just offhand, anybody know where I can get the source to rpm? I found
> rpms for make 3.79, but I don't have the util.
>
make-3.79 should be at all the GNU mirrors by now. Here's a few
to try
http://wuarchive.wustl.edu
(in systems/gnu/make I think)
http://metalab.unc.edu
(in pub/gnu/make I think)
and the GNU home ...
http://www.gnu.org
ftp://ftp.gnu.org
--
###############################
# Art Haas
# (713) 689-2417
###############################
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robie Basak)
Subject: Re: GLIBC 2 - Which version.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 Apr 2000 21:58:13 GMT
[followups redirected to comp.os.linux.setup]
On 24 Apr 2000 18:43:27 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>Hey all,
>
>For various reasons, I'm trying to get glibc 2 - a.k.a. libc 6 - installed
>on my box. What is the latest stable version? According to the HOWTO on
>www.linux.org, 2.0.6 is the example. However, various 2.1.x versions are
>available on ftp.gnu.org, and something I read someplace refers to v2.1 as
>the "next stable release".
>
>I'm running a very old version of Slackware, so RPMs aren't going to help.
>I was planning on compiling it, but when I got glibc-2.1.3.tar.gz and the
>latest glibc-crypt, glibc-linuxthreads, and glibc-localedata from ftp.gnu.org
>it failed the 'make'.
As it happens, I'm compiling glibc-2.1.3 in the other screen window now.
Oh, it just finished, now it's doing `make tests`.
I believe it's stable, though I have yet to find out.
You need gcc-2.95.? to compile it; do you have it? If not, you'll need
to upgrade gcc first.
Robie.
--
------------------------------
Subject: Home PNA Support
From: dtdcovey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:08:40 -0700
Has anyone heard of any Home PNA cards being supported under
Linux? Any specifics? My understanding is that the driver would
basically be written as if for an Ethernet card. An
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Any validating XML Parsers?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 22:35:16 GMT
In comp.os.linux.development.apps M Sweger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a "validating" free XML parser which validates agains't
> the DTD or the XML schema. I know about SAX, but it isn't a validating one;
> nor are any of the Perl ones I've come across.
nsgmls is a free, validating SGML parser which supports XML 1.0. See
http://www.jclark.com and follow the link named SP. I think you'll
find all of Mr Clark's tools to be the best of the lot.
> Thanks for any info and leads to one.
I'd also try comp.text.sgml, where all the experts hang out, and Robin
Cover's web page, www.oasis-open.org/cover, which links to everything
you could ever want.
--
Matt Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: What does this mean?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:11:26 +0100
I found this in a piece of Solaris code, can anyone tell me what it means:
typedef thing {
.
.
.
} identifier, newidentifier __attribute__ ((packed));
What does "__attribute__ ((packed))" mean?!?!?
Thanks in advance, please reply to group.
Michael
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.development.system) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Development-System Digest
******************************
