Who runs this list?
Why do I keep getting this Mail Failure when I post to this list?
&
Is anyone else getting this, from posting here?

I didn't send that message to any other email addy at all.


Dan

>Date:  Sat, 06 Jun 1998 13:40:00 -0700
>From:  "Auto Reg 1013492" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Mail failure
>To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>FROM: SANDPOINT/SANDPOINT/POSTMASTER
>TO: Dan Cyr                                                    DATE: 06-06-98
>                                                               TIME: 13:40
>SUBJECT: Mail failure
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>
>[002] Mail was received that was addressed to unknown addresses.
>Mail item was not delivered to:
>  Tom Yamada
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>From: Dan Cyr
>To:  Tom Yamada
>     linux-diald
>Subject:  Re: Diald lookup failures on linux only
>Date: 1998-06-06 12:59
>Priority: 3
>Message ID: Fabrik-00040006469953
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>From: Dan Cyr
>Date: Sat, Jun 6, 1998 12:59 PM
>Subject: Re: Diald lookup failures on linux only
>To: linux-diald; Tom Yamada
>
>
>Ok,
>
>
>Simple solution to route bring the diald link up.
>
>
>Add an entry to /etc/hosts for 192.168.0.2
>
>I call mine 192.168.0.2         diald-route
>
>
>And, yes the missing defaultroute to sl0 is the reason it's not
>working....Sorry but I haven't a clue as to why it's disappeared.
>
>
>
>Dan
>
>
>At 09:47 PM 6/6/98 +0200, Dr.J.C.Woestenburg wrote: 
>
>>>>>
>
><excerpt>Dear Dan, 
>
>
>You should be close to the explanation. 
>
>When I installed the new slackware 3.4 version I noticed that the 
>
>route behaviour was different. The former version gave route information 
>
>without a delay. The current route does something extra. 
>
>Route and also netstate call to the internet: 
>
>
>This happens after netstat -r: 
>
>
>First there is a default route sl0 (the slip line) 
>
>Then  there is no default route for some while 
>
>Thereafter the ppp0 default route comes up 
>
>
><smaller>artemis:/var/log# diald</smaller> 
>
><smaller>artemis:/var/log# netstat -r</smaller> 
>
><smaller>Kernel IP routing table</smaller> 
>
><smaller>Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS
>Window  irtt Iface</smaller> 
>
><smaller>192.168.0.2     *               255.255.255.255 UH     1500 0   
>      0 sl0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>localnet        *               255.255.255.0   U      1500 0   
>      0 eth0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>loopback        *               255.0.0.0       U      3584 0   
>      0 lo</smaller> 
>
><smaller>default         *               0.0.0.0         U      1500 0   
>      0 sl0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>artemis:/var/log# netstat -r</smaller> 
>
><smaller>Kernel IP routing table</smaller> 
>
><smaller>Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS
>Window  irtt Iface</smaller> 
>
><smaller>192.168.0.2     *               255.255.255.255 UH     1500 0   
>      0 sl0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>localnet        *               255.255.255.0   U      1500 0   
>      0 eth0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>loopback        *               255.0.0.0       U      3584 0   
>      0 lo</smaller> 
>
><smaller>artemis:/var/log# netstat -r</smaller> 
>
><smaller>Kernel IP routing table</smaller> 
>
><smaller>Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS
>Window  irtt Iface</smaller> 
>
><smaller>192.168.0.2     *               255.255.255.255 UH     1500 0   
>      0 sl0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>localnet        *               255.255.255.0   U      1500 0   
>      0 eth0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>loopback        *               255.0.0.0       U      3584 0   
>      0 lo</smaller> 
>
><smaller>artemis:/var/log# netstat -r</smaller> 
>
><smaller>Kernel IP routing table</smaller> 
>
><smaller>Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS
>Window  irtt Iface</smaller> 
>
><smaller>192.168.0.2     *               255.255.255.255 UH     1500 0   
>      0 sl0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>speed.xs4all.ne *               255.255.255.255 UH     1500 0   
>      0 ppp0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>localnet        *               255.255.255.0   U      1500 0   
>      0 eth0</smaller> 
>
><smaller>loopback        *               255.0.0.0       U      3584 0   
>      0 lo</smaller> 
>
><smaller>default         *               0.0.0.0         U      1500 0   
>      0 ppp0</smaller> 
>
> 
>
>
>Either the sl0 default route or the missing one might be the cause. 
>
>
>Jaap 
>
>
><excerpt>Dan Cyr wrote: Most likely you have a defaultroute to eth0 
>
>
>route del default eth0 should do it. 
>
>
>I'm not sure where in slackware you can remove it on bootup. In redhat
>it's /etc/sysconfig/network so try find / -iname network to see if
>slackware uses the same file ( /etc/sysconfig doesn't exist in slackware
>though). 
>
>
>Of course you could put the route del command in /etc/rc.d/rc.local 
>
>
>Then again maybe this isn't your problem.....if it isn't then I don't
>know what is. 
>
>
>Dan 
>
>
>At 01:06 PM 6/6/98 +0200, Dr.J.C.Woestenburg wrote: 
>
>>>>> 
>
>
>     Diald lookup failures on linux only 
>
>
>     Hi, 
>
>
>     I'm using Slackware Linux 3.4 on a Pentium II 233 and diald 1.6.5
>patch. 
>
>     Diald has worked OK on Slackware version 3.1, however migrating to
>3.4 from 
>
>     scratch on has caused lookup failures slightly before the moment of 
>
>     dialing. 
>
>
>     Prior to dialing up to the moment that the ppp-connection is made, 
>
>     lookup failures are reported by netscape, ftp, telnet etc. 
>
>     This only occurs for programs launched from the linux station. 
>
>
>     Par example: ftp returns 
>
>     Hostname lookup failure 
>
>     When I retry after the connection has been made, the world is
>connected. 
>
>
>     I'm using a local network with a firewall, masquerade and Samba. 
>
>     On the local net are windows NT 3.51 and NT 4.0 as main
>workstations. 
>
>
>     Firing up netscape, ftp, telnet, etc from the NT stations works
>fine. 
>
>     Here, there are no problems with lookup of names or IP-numbers. 
>
>
>     It looks as if diald works correct and that the problem should be in 
>
>     some of the Slackware programs, however, it might be that procedures 
>
>     are different for linux and NT. 
>
>
>     Is there a conflict in procedures between diald and new linux
>functions? 
>
>
>     Does somebody knows the solution. 
>
>
>     Thanks in advance, 
>
>
>     Jaap Woestenburg 
>
>     -- ------------------------------ *TALO bv, Lijsterlaan 379, 1403 AZ
>Bussum,The Netherlands tel/fax +31-35-69 32 801 tel +31-65 46 83 544
>e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><<<<http://www.xs4all.nl/~talo/>http://www.xs4all.nl/~talo/><<http://www.xs
4all
>l.nl/~talo/>http://www.xs4all.nl/~talo/
>------------------------------ 
>
>
></excerpt>- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>linux-diald" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -- 
>------------------------------ *TALO bv, Lijsterlaan 379, 1403 AZ
>Bussum,The Netherlands tel/fax +31-35-69 32 801 tel     +31-65 46 83 544
>e-mail  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><<http://www.xs4all.nl/~talo/>http://www.xs4all.nl/~talo/
>------------------------------  
>
></excerpt>
>
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>----------
>Received: from otter.mbay.net by powell.fabrik.com
>        with ESMTP (Fabrik F07.3-000) 
>        id [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Sat, 6 Jun 1998 13:12:06 -0700
>Received: from listserv.funet.fi (listserv.funet.fi [128.214.248.27])
>        by otter.mbay.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA12517
>        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 6 Jun 1998 13:11:18 -0700
>Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2]:52261 "EHLO vger.rutgers.edu"
>ident: "TIMEDOUT") by listserv.funet.fi with ESMTP id <2916-29451>; Sat, 6
>Jun 1998 23:10:38 +0300
>Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <971276-31949>; Sat, 6 Jun 1998 14:40:47
>-0400
>Received: from [206.12.160.1] ([206.12.160.1]:10353 "EHLO
>hicks.valleynet.bc.ca" ident: "root") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id
><971252-31949>; Sat, 6 Jun 1998 14:40:23 -0400
>Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (port 28164
>[206.12.160.25]) by valleynet.bc.ca with SMTP id <741429-27496>; Sat, 6 Jun
>1998 13:05:26 +0000
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
>Date:   Sat, 06 Jun 1998 12:59:13 -0700
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Dan Cyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Diald lookup failures on linux only
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/enriched; charset="us-ascii"
>X-Orcpt: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Precedence: bulk
>X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>----------
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to