I am using the (slightly modified but not in this point) diald config file
'standard.filter' . It worked fine for me until I set up my own little dns.

Usually a domain request is the first packet sent out which will bring up the
link, as standard.filters comments it:
># Rules for UDP packets
>#
># We time out domain requests right away, we just want them to bring
># the link up, not keep it around for very long.
># This is because the network will usually come up on a call
># from the resolver library (unless you have all your commonly
># used addresses in /etc/hosts, in which case you will discover
># other problems.)
># Note that you should not make the timeout shorter than the time you
># might expect your DNS server to take to respond. Otherwise
># when the initial link gets established there might be a delay
># greater than this between the initial series of packets before
># any packets that keep the link up longer pass over the link.

a few lines later I find
># Don't bring up on domain name requests between two running nameds.
>ignore udp udp.dest=udp.domain,udp.source=udp.domain
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
># Bring up the network whenever we make a domain request from someplace
># other than named.
>accept udp 30 udp.dest=udp.domain 
>accept udp 30 udp.source=udp.domain

But when I am using my own dns (with my provider's dns "above it", of course)
there will always be a domain request from my named to that on e of my provider.
So I need to comment out the line marked ^^^^^^ to get things working.

Q:
In which situations other than forwarding a domain request diald will see
packets matching the rule marked above?

Could there arise any problems from this?

I intend to run my linux box unattended in the future. 
Mike or Eric, could you add a little comment on that line that there must be
made a difference when one is running it's own dns?


Olaf


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to