Thanks! I'll go grab a copy...no sense spending time getting something old
to work! :^)
-- Mike "maybe we should pass this along to the diald home page?" Bartman --
At 07:27 AM 5/31/99 -0500, Robert C. Paulsen, Jr. wrote:
>"Michael D. Bartman" wrote:
>>
>> At 10:13 AM 5/30/99 -0400, Tom Diehl wrote:
>> >On Fri, 28 May 1999, Mike Jagdis wrote:
>> >
>> >> Incidentally diald 0.16 is *ancient*. Distributors should, at least,
>> >> be using 0.16.5 which Eric released a long time ago. Since then I've
>> >> taken over diald and newer (current 0.99) versions are available
>> >> from http://diald.unix.c
>>
>> The Diald Home Page (http://www.loonie.net/~eschenk/diald.html) is still
>> handing out 0.16 as the current version, with a patch file available to get
>> you to 0.16-5. Is this wrong? The page makes it appear that it is owned
>> by the developer of diald...since I'm brand new to linux I have no idea
>> what's going on, and assumed that this was the most recent version
>> available. Apparenlty I was wrong...but at least the page got me to this
>> list! :^)
>>
>
>The new version is 0.99 and can be found at http://diald.unix.ch/
>
>____________________________________________________________________
>Robert Paulsen http://paulsen.home.texas.net
>
>
*****************************************************************************
* Mike Bartman * Puzzles Pondered Obfuscation Obliterated *
* Omniphiles International * Confusion Canceled Opinions Offered *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Options Outlined Smiles Stimulated *
*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*
* "We do it all! No job too small! No price too high! *
****************************************************************************
*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
