On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 12:40:42PM +0800, Brett Wallace wrote:
> I am running Redhat 5.1 with kernel 2.0.36.
>
> Whilst compiling diald, I find that the proxy_tap code trying to be
> compiled in. The reason for this is that the AF_NETLINK is defined in
> /usr/include/socketbits.h. The definition is the same as the one in the
> file /usr/include/bits/socket.h under Redhat 6.0 with kernel 2.2.5-15.
>
> Thus is there another #define apart from AF_NETLINK that can be used to
> determine if the proxy_tap code should be compiled, like HAVE_AF_NETLINK
> ?
>
> Also where do I find a list of these #defines? Eg. HAVE_AF_PACKET and
> where are they defined?
>
> Or am I doing something wrong??
No, you not doing anything wrong. The source assumes that you are using
a kernel that supports the correct interfaces. #undef them at the end
of diald.h This is quickly becoming a FAQ.
--
Gyepi Sam --+-- Designer/Programmer --+-- Network/System Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --+-- http://www.praxis-sw.com/gyepi
Who does not trust enough will not be trusted. -- Lao Tsu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
