Ignore my last message.  I was misreading your rcroute output.
Sorry.

On Sun, 02 Apr 2000, you wrote:
> hello tim !
> 
> thanks for your reply !
> 
> Tim Coleman wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Did you try the defaultroute option to diald?
> > 
> > Tim
> 
> yes, i did.
> here's my config file:
> 
> <config>      
>       mode ppp
>       connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/diald.chat"
>       fifo /etc/diald.ctl
>       device /dev/ttyS0
>       speed 115200
>       modem
>       lock
>       crtscts
>       local 192.168.200.210
>       remote 132.252.170.158
>       defaultroute
>       dynamic
>       include /usr/lib/diald/standard.filter
>       accounting-log /var/log/diald.log
> </>
> 
> if i understand the manpage correctly, this option sets a default
> route to the slip device when the link is not yet established. this
> works. as soon as somebody sends a packet to a host outside the
> local net, diald starts the connect script. but afterwards, there is
> no longer a default route.
> 
> here is what happens to the route:
> 
> diald not started:
>   spunk:~ # rcroute status
>   192.168.200.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   eth0
>   127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0      
> lo                              
> 
> diald started:
>   spunk:~ # rcroute status
>   132.252.170.158 0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 sl0
>   192.168.200.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   eth0
>   127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       lo
>   default         0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0        
> sl0                             
> 
> now i have sent a trigger and diald 
> has established the connection:
> 
>   spunk:~ # rcroute status
>   132.252.170.158 0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 ppp0
>   192.168.200.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   eth0
>   127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0      
> lo                              
> 
> the default entry is gone to the land where routing tables are
> eternally blessed...
> any ideas ?
> 
> btw, i got a message that my post was being archived.
> i scanned the archive quickly, but i found no clue, except for the
> problem with the missing tap devices.
> 
> anyway, i seem to have a slightly  outdated version of diald
> (0.99.1).
> is it advisable to upgrade to 0.99.4 ?
> 
> yours,
> 
> j�rn
> 
> 
> > --
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Tim Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Software Developer/Systems Administrator/RDBMS Specialist/Linux Advocate
> > University of Waterloo Honours Co-op Combinatorics & Optimization
> > "Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company." -- Mark Twain
> > 
> >   --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
> 
> -- 
> J�rn Nettingsmeier     
> Kurf�rstenstr. 49        
> 45138 Essen, Germany
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
_______________________________________________________
Steve N. McCall:                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to