There is wrong comment in example for compiler store omit behavior. It
shows example of the problem and than problem solved version code.
However, the comment in the solved version is still same with not solved
version. Fix the wrong statement with this commit.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.p...@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 061ff29..b4754c7 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ of optimizations:
wrong guess:
WRITE_ONCE(a, 0);
- /* Code that does not store to variable a. */
+ /* Code that does store to variable a. */
WRITE_ONCE(a, 0);
(*) The compiler is within its rights to reorder memory accesses unless
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
