On 2016-05-03 23:39, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> Yes, they look like reasonable complaints. > > Thanks for fixing them. I just sent out my latest comments and when you > fix those and send V8, I'll apply that right away. I think we are safe > to fix the rest incrementally if needed. Note that I didn't review the
Sounds like a plan. > IIO and media patches, I trust the reviewers on those. > > Thanks for your work on this! I need a break now, this is > mind-boggling... And thanks for reviewing it! A question on best practices here... I already did a v8 (but only as a branch) so I think this will be v9, bit that's a minor detail. The real question is what I should do about patches 1-15 that are already in next? Send them too? If not, should I send 16-24 with the same old patch numbers or should they be numbered 1-9 now? And should such a shortened series be rebased on 1-15 in next? Or does it not really matter? Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
