Em Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:00:33 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net> escreveu:

> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:56:35 +0200
> Markus Heiser <markus.hei...@darmarit.de> wrote:
> > > I submitted one patch fixing it. Not sure if it got merged by Jon
> > > or not.  
> > 
> > Ups, I might have overseen this patch .. as Jon said, its hard to
> > follow you ;)
> > 
> > I tested the above with Jon's docs-next, so it seems your patch is
> > not yet applied. Could you send me a link for this patch? (sorry,
> > I can't find it).
> Send again, please?  I'll add it to the pile of other stuff, and try not
> to lose it again...:)

Gah, there are so many patches that I'm also confused whether I sent something
or just dreamed about sending it :)

I actually sent a patch doing this on a /47 patch series, but only
for macros:

        Subject: [PATCH 01/47] kernel-doc: ignore arguments on macro definitions

I was thinking on doing the same for functions, but didn't actually
submitted such patch.

Yet, it seems more coherent, IMHO, to use use same approach for both C
functions and macros: presenting just the name instead of printing the

I'll work on it and submit, likely tomorrow.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to