On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 02:09:58PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ram Pai <linux...@us.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > index d4e545d..fe1e7c7 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > +#include <linux/pkeys.h>
> > #include <linux/stddef.h>
> > #include <linux/unistd.h>
> > #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> > @@ -247,6 +248,15 @@ void user_single_step_siginfo(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > info->si_addr = (void __user *)regs->nip;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> > +static void fill_sig_info_pkey(int si_code, siginfo_t *info, unsigned long
> > addr)
> > +{
> > + if (si_code != SEGV_PKUERR)
> > + return;
>
> Given that SEGV_PKUERR is a signal specific si_code this test is
> insufficient to detect an pkey error. You also need to check
> that signr == SIGSEGV
true. will make it a more precise check.
Thanks
RP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
